privilege-log-review

Classify privilege log entries and flag uncertain cases for attorney review.

Updated May 26, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/yachela/claude-for-legal-ar --skill privilege-log-review-yachela
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: privilege-log-review
Source: https://github.com/yachela/claude-for-legal-ar/tree/main/litigation-legal/skills/privilege-log-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/yachela/claude-for-legal-ar --skill privilege-log-review-yachela

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

It helps you quickly sort privilege-log entries into obvious privileged, obvious not privileged, and the close calls that require an attorney’s judgment—without making subjective decisions for waiver- and standard-based issues.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • First-pass privilege triage: flags hard entries for attorney review while making clear-cut calls.
  • Close-call discipline: keeps a privilege designation in uncertain cases and adds a targeted question plus evidence for counsel to decide.
  • Log readiness checks: validates required fields (date, author, recipients, document type, privilege claimed, and sufficient non-revealing description).
  • Citation and provenance rigor: enforces pinpoint-support coverage and a two-pass citation workflow (extract first, then verify).
  • Jurisdiction & waiver awareness: applies privilege-log rules for the configured forum and surfaces waiver-doctrine differences by privilege type.

Quick Start

Run privilege-log-review on your log file to get a reviewed privilege log with clear buckets (✅, ❌, ✅+⚠️) and attorney-focused questions on the hard entries.

Frequently Asked Questions about privilege-log-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review a privilege log to flag entries for attorney review?

Privilege log triage works by reviewing entries individually to classify obvious privileged and non-privileged items while flagging uncertain cases with evidence for attorney determination.

What is the best way to handle waiver risk and jurisdiction rules during privilege log production?

Handling waiver risk requires applying jurisdiction-aware waiver doctrine gating to privilege log entries, surfacing standard-based differences by privilege type while preserving designations for uncertain items.

How do I validate required fields and descriptions before producing a privilege log?

Validating required fields for privilege log readiness involves checking that date, author, recipients, document type, privilege claimed, and sufficient non-revealing descriptions are present for each entry.

Can I automate citation extraction and verification for privilege log entries?

You can enforce citation and provenance rigor through a two-pass citation workflow that extracts citations first, then verifies pinpoint-support coverage for each privilege log entry.

Does privilege log QA distinguish between recommendations and actions on uncertain documents?

Privilege log QA distinguishes recommendations from actions by keeping the privilege designation in uncertain cases and adding a targeted question for counsel, ensuring outputs preserve designations without making subjective waiver decisions.