What problem does it solve?
Helps you transform an experience, observation, or vague curiosity into a theoretically meaningful research question by diagnosing whether your current phrasing is actually a research problem and by identifying where it can intervene in academic theoretical debates.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Research-question diagnosis: Differentiates between an experience question (answerable by description) and a research question (requiring theoretical mechanisms and scholarly contribution).
- Theoretical dialogue positioning: Generates 2–4 candidate theoretical “dialogues,” explains their core disputes and open issues, and maps how your question could intervene (verification, modification, extension, or challenge).
- Triple-test quality check: Evaluates theoretical contribution, the “So What” implication if findings match expectations, and feasibility (data access, method fit, time/resources).
- Drafting output for next steps: Produces 1–2 refined research-question drafts with contribution intent, method path suggestions, and risk warnings, ending with a fixed reminder to let the researcher make the final decision.
Quick Start
Tell the skill your original topic statement (even if vague) and, if you have them, any constraints like data access, timeframe, and target journal type, so it can run the full diagnosis and generate research-question drafts.