What problem does it solve?
Normalize scattered, incomplete, or contradictory project inputs into a single discovery snapshot that captures the problem framing, outcomes, assumptions, and risks so architecture work can start with a shared understanding and visible decision areas.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Source consolidation: Read product briefs, support notes, research, and competitor references to extract goals, actors, constraints, and evidence into a unified narrative.
- Conflict and uncertainty labeling: Mark contradictions and unknowns explicitly as QUESTION, ASSUMPTION, RISK, or CONFLICT and surface targeted human review questions.
- Artifact production and handoff: Produce a normalized context-and-goals document, glossary, and a HUS-* concept-review story to request human decision before architecture proceeds.
- Use case example: Turn a short product brief plus scattered stakeholder notes into docs/architecture/context-and-goals.md with labeled assumptions and a review story for the concept-review gate.
Quick Start
Run the prod-concept-intake skill with all available source documents and instruct the assistant to write the normalized concept summary into docs/architecture/context-and-goals.md and create the concept-review HUS story.