What problem does it solve? Competitive assessments often rely on marketing claims or memory rather than verifiable facts. This Skill produces competitive analyses where every claim is traceable to concrete local code artifacts, config files, or command output, eliminating unsupported assertions. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Code-First Evidence Collection: Inventories implemented features, provider architectures, state management, and persistence layers directly from source files with line-range citations. - Structured Analysis Framework: Produces fixed-order sections covering feature inventory, target users, differentiators, missing table-stakes, security/distribution blockers, UX risks, and positioning. - Category-Aware Comparison: Distinguishes native host-app integrations from standalone replacements before scoring, avoiding apples-to-oranges feature comparisons. - Use Case: Point it at a local iOS voice-assistant project and ask how it compares to mainstream alternatives; it returns a positioning report citing exact files and line ranges, flagging App Store blockers like permission handling and secrets management. ## Quick Start Analyze this local Xcode project and produce a competitive assessment against mainstream alternatives, citing file paths and line ranges for every claim.
