project-doctor

Project health diagnosis requires aggregating module counts, file sizes, and architecture signals to identify hotspots. A six-step automated health check workflow systematically inspects frontend and backend workstreams to detect structural risks and provide remediation guidance.

Static analysis and remediation planning are automated by running dedicated checkup scripts that generate diagnostic reports. These reports trace module structure and code health issues, enabling teams to propose fixes and track progress during development and release cycles.

An architecture review and project health check is needed when assessing code quality, reliability, and maintainability across frontend and backend workstreams. It identifies potential risks and hotspots before they impact long-term maintainability during development or release audits.

Code review audits can be performed simultaneously for frontend and backend workstreams. The system applies modular data collection and static analysis to both sides, generating dedicated health reports under traceable output paths for comprehensive architecture review.

The six-step health check workflow generates traceable audit reports by executing checkup scripts that output diagnostic markdown files. These files are structured under specific project checkup directories, capturing structural statistics and code review insights for each tag and workstream.

Project health monitoring operates without external dependencies by aggregating module counts and file sizes internally. It calculates architecture health signals directly from the existing project structure to identify hotspots and guide remediation planning.