What problem does it solve?
Teams often document coding standards, naming conventions, and tool selection policies in files like CLAUDE.md and AGENTS.md, but manual code reviews regularly miss violations of these explicit rules, leading to inconsistent codebases, broken cross-references, and avoidable technical debt over time.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Standards-Aware Auditing: Reviews code changes against project-specific standards files (including root-level and directory-scoped CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md) instead of generic best practices, ensuring alignment with your team's written rules.
- Cited, Actionable Findings: Every reported violation includes the exact rule and source file, so developers can fix issues immediately without guesswork.
- Use Case: Run this reviewer as part of your pre-merge workflow to catch frontmatter errors in skill/agent files, broken cross-references, non-compliant tool usage, and naming convention violations before they reach the main branch.
Quick Start
Use the project-standards-reviewer skill to audit the changes in your current pull request against your repository's documented standards before merging.