prompt-engineering-patterns

Apply prompt-engineering patterns for few-shot, chain-of-thought, and template systems.

Updated Feb 26, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/AndyAnh174/wellness --skill prompt-engineering-patterns-andyanh174
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: prompt-engineering-patterns
Source: https://github.com/AndyAnh174/wellness/tree/main/.agent/skills/prompt-engineering-patterns
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/AndyAnh174/wellness --skill prompt-engineering-patterns-andyanh174

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) and assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This skill helps prompt engineers and developers build robust, maintainable prompts by applying structured patterns that improve reliability, controllability, and scalability in production LLM tasks.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Pattern-driven prompt design for few-shot learning, chain-of-thought, template systems, and system prompts
  • Structured evaluation, verification, and safety checks to detect and mitigate errors
  • Template modularity and reuse across multiple tasks and teams
  • Guidance for integrating prompts with RAG, validation workflows, and performance monitoring
  • Real-world scenarios including production prompts, chat assistants, and automation pipelines

Quick Start

Provide a production-ready prompt template using the patterns outlined to optimize an LLM task.

Frequently Asked Questions about prompt-engineering-patterns

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I apply prompt engineering patterns to improve LLM output reliability?

Apply prompt engineering patterns like few-shot selection, chain-of-thought, and template systems to structure LLM inputs. This enforces evaluation and safety checks, ensuring robust, reliable outputs for production tasks.

What is the best way to structure few-shot examples and chain-of-thought in a production prompt?

The best way to structure few-shot examples and chain-of-thought is by using template modularity and pattern-driven design. This approach enables consistent reuse across multiple tasks while maintaining structured prompt evaluation.

Can I use prompt template systems for scaling LLM tasks across different teams?

Yes, you can use prompt template systems to scale LLM tasks across teams. Modular templates allow pattern-driven prompt design to be reused, ensuring controllability and maintainability in production automation pipelines.

How do I integrate system prompts with RAG and validation workflows?

Integrate system prompts with RAG and validation workflows by applying structured prompt-engineering patterns. This approach provides guidance for combining system prompts with performance monitoring and safety checks.

Why does my LLM output fail consistency checks in production chat assistants?

LLM output fails consistency checks without structured prompt-engineering patterns. Implementing template systems, few-shot selection, and chain-of-thought design enforces verification and mitigates errors in production chat assistants.

When should I not use chain-of-thought patterns for an LLM task?

Avoid chain-of-thought patterns for simple LLM tasks where structured evaluation and safety checks are unnecessary. Overcomplicating basic prompts with advanced pattern-driven design can reduce template modularity and efficiency.