prompt-engineering-patterns

Apply few-shot templates, chain-of-thought patterns, and verification steps to production prompts.

72|8|Updated Apr 30, 2022
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Kurarion/Genshin-Calc --skill prompt-engineering-patterns-kurarion
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: prompt-engineering-patterns
Source: https://github.com/Kurarion/Genshin-Calc/tree/main/.claude/skills/wshobson-prompt-engineering-patterns
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Kurarion/Genshin-Calc --skill prompt-engineering-patterns-kurarion

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires numpy, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) and assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps you design, test, and optimize prompts to improve LLM performance, reliability, and controllability across tasks.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Pattern Library: Bundle and reuse prompt structures (system, task, examples) to standardize LLM interactions.
  • Evaluation & Validation: Built-in workflows for testing prompts, measuring accuracy, latency, and consistency.
  • Advanced Techniques: Includes chain-of-thought, few-shot, and verification patterns for complex reasoning tasks.
  • Use Case: Rapidly craft production-ready prompts for decision support, data extraction, or code generation with robust guardrails.

Quick Start

Provide an optimized, template-based prompt for a given task with few-shot examples and a verification step.

Frequently Asked Questions about prompt-engineering-patterns

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I design production-ready prompts with few-shot examples and chain-of-thought reasoning?

Production-ready prompts are designed using a structured workflow that applies few-shot templates and chain-of-thought patterns to standardize LLM interactions. This approach improves model performance and controllability by providing explicit reasoning steps and task examples.

What is the best way to measure LLM prompt accuracy and consistency?

The best way to measure prompt accuracy and consistency is using built-in evaluation and validation workflows. These workflows test prompts against metrics like latency and accuracy to ensure robust, auditable results before deploying to production.

When do I need verification steps and safety guardrails in prompt engineering?

Verification steps and safety guardrails are needed when generating complex outputs like code or data extraction. They ensure reliable, auditable results by validating the LLM's reasoning process and preventing unsafe or inconsistent model behaviors.

Can I reuse and version prompt structures across different LLM tasks?

Yes, you can reuse and version prompt structures across tasks using a pattern library. This library bundles system, task, and example components to standardize interactions, ensuring consistent versioning and evaluation metrics across different LLM workflows.

Does this prompt optimization workflow require numpy to run evaluation metrics?

Yes, numpy is required as a dependency to run the prompt optimization workflow. It supports the underlying computational logic needed to process evaluation metrics, validation workflows, and structured templates within the pattern library.