prompt-engineering-patterns

Design and implement prompt patterns for LLM tasks with validation and safety checks.

Updated Mar 10, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Palbahngmiyine/harness --skill prompt-engineering-patterns-palbahngmiyine
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: prompt-engineering-patterns
Source: https://github.com/Palbahngmiyine/harness/tree/main/skills/prompt-engineering-patterns
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Palbahngmiyine/harness --skill prompt-engineering-patterns-palbahngmiyine

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires numpy, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) and assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Master advanced prompt engineering techniques to maximize LLM performance, reliability, and controllability across production prompts and templates.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Few-Shot Learning patterns for dynamic example selection, diversity, and edge-case coverage.
  • Chain-of-Thought and Tree-of-Thought prompting templates to improve reasoning and verifiability.
  • Template systems and system-prompt design for consistent, reusable prompt architectures.
  • Prompt optimization and validation workflows, including evaluation metrics and versioning.

Quick Start

Provide a ready-to-run prompt template that demonstrates few-shot, chain-of-thought, and system-prompt patterns for a representative task.

Frequently Asked Questions about prompt-engineering-patterns

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I design LLM system prompts for consistent production workflows?

Designing LLM system prompts involves creating reusable template architectures that ensure consistent, controllable performance. This approach applies validation, safety checks, and versioning directly within production workflows to maximize reliability.

What is chain-of-thought prompting and when should I use it for LLM tasks?

Chain-of-thought prompting is a technique using templates to improve LLM reasoning and verifiability. You should use it for complex LLM tasks requiring structured, step-by-step logical deduction to reach reliable conclusions.

How do I implement few-shot learning patterns for dynamic example selection?

Implement few-shot learning by applying prompt patterns designed for dynamic example selection, diversity, and edge-case coverage. This ensures LLM tasks receive contextual examples, improving output reliability across varied inputs.

Does prompt engineering require validation workflows for quality control?

Prompt engineering requires validation workflows to ensure quality control and reliability. These workflows embed evaluation metrics, safety checks, and versioning into the LLM template system to maintain production standards.

What's the best way to structure prompt templates for reusable LLM architectures?

The best way to structure prompt templates is using system-prompt design patterns that create consistent, reusable architectures. This approach standardizes prompts, enabling reliable performance and easier maintenance across LLM workflows.

Why does my LLM output lack reliability despite using prompt templates?

LLM output lacks reliability when prompt templates lack embedded safety checks, evaluation metrics, and proper few-shot diversity. Applying structured prompt patterns with validation workflows resolves inconsistencies and improves performance.