prompt-engineering-patterns

Design, test, and iterate prompts with few-shot and chain-of-thought patterns.

1|Updated Apr 14, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Sumeet138/qwen-code-agents --skill prompt-engineering-patterns-sumeet138
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: prompt-engineering-patterns
Source: https://github.com/Sumeet138/qwen-code-agents/tree/main/plugins/llm-application-dev/skills/prompt-engineering-patterns
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Sumeet138/qwen-code-agents --skill prompt-engineering-patterns-sumeet138

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires numpy, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This skill helps AI practitioners and developers design, test, and refine prompts using proven patterns to improve reliability, controllability, and repeatable outcomes in production workflows.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Few-shot and dynamic example selection for accurate task framing across classification, code, and data tasks.
  • Chain-of-Thought and tree-of-thought patterns to structure reasoning and improve problem solving.
  • Structured outputs and validation to enable reliable parsing and error handling.
  • Progressive disclosure and role-based system prompts to tailor behavior for different roles and domains.
  • Verification, error recovery, and versioned prompts to maintain quality over time.

Quick Start

Construct a production-ready prompt using a few-shot example set and a structured output schema, then test it on a representative query.

Frequently Asked Questions about prompt-engineering-patterns

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I improve prompt reliability for production LLM workflows?

Improve prompt reliability by applying patterns like few-shot selection, chain-of-thought, and structured outputs to design, test, and iterate prompts with measurable, controllable outcomes. This enforces safe, bounded interactions for production-grade tasks.

What is the best way to structure LLM reasoning for complex problem solving?

Structure LLM reasoning using chain-of-thought and tree-of-thought patterns. These prompt engineering techniques break down complex problems into sequential steps, improving accuracy across coding, analytics, and documentation tasks.

How do I enforce structured outputs and validation when generating prompts?

Enforce structured outputs by defining a validation schema within your prompt. This enables reliable parsing, systematic error recovery, and consistent formatting for downstream data processing and analytics tasks.

Can I use few-shot examples for dynamic task framing across different domains?

Yes, you can use dynamic few-shot example selection for accurate task framing. This pattern adapts prompts across classification, code generation, and data tasks, ensuring repeatable outcomes tailored to specific domains.

Do I need numpy to implement prompt versioning and evaluation?

Numpy is a required dependency for this skill. It supports the systematic evaluation and measurable improvements of versioned prompts, allowing you to track quality over time and maintain error recovery protocols.

When should I use role-based system prompts over standard prompts?

Use role-based system prompts when you need progressive disclosure to tailor behavior for different domains and roles. This pattern bounds interactions safely and adapts framing for specialized coding or analytics tasks.