prompt-engineering

Optimize LLM prompts with few-shot examples and chain-of-thought templates.

Updated Apr 5, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/rizaldiem/digital-invitation-web_V2 --skill prompt-engineering-rizaldiem
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: prompt-engineering
Source: https://github.com/rizaldiem/digital-invitation-web_V2/tree/main/.windsurf/skills/prompt-engineering
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/rizaldiem/digital-invitation-web_V2 --skill prompt-engineering-rizaldiem

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill reduces the trial-and-error burden of designing prompts by providing repeatable patterns, validation workflows, and optimization frameworks that improve accuracy, consistency, and cost-efficiency of LLM-driven tasks.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Few-Shot Example Selection: Semantic similarity and diversity sampling strategies for selecting 3-5 high-impact examples.
  • Chain-of-Thought Templates: Structured CoT patterns to elicit step-by-step reasoning and self-consistency checks.
  • Prompt Optimization & Monitoring: Iterative A/B testing, performance metrics (accuracy, consistency, token efficiency, latency), and rollback strategies for production prompts.
  • Template Systems & System Prompts: Modular templates, conditional sections, and system prompt frameworks for consistent behavior across models.
  • Use Case: Optimize a customer-support classification pipeline by crafting few-shot prompts, running controlled A/B tests, and deploying the best prompt with continuous monitoring to maintain >90% accuracy.

Quick Start

Draft an optimized few-shot prompt using three diverse examples and a chain-of-thought template, specify the required output format and validation criteria.

Frequently Asked Questions about prompt-engineering

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I improve LLM accuracy and consistency with prompt engineering?

Improve LLM accuracy and consistency using prompt engineering by applying chain-of-thought templates, few-shot example selection, and iterative A/B testing to validate output performance and token efficiency.

What is the best way to structure few-shot examples for large language models?

The best way to structure few-shot examples for large language models is selecting 3-5 high-impact examples using semantic similarity and diversity sampling to elicit accurate reasoning and consistent task performance.

How do I set up A/B testing for production-scale prompt optimization?

Set up A/B testing for production-scale prompt optimization by defining performance metrics like accuracy, consistency, and token efficiency, then running controlled tests with rollback strategies to deploy the best prompt.

Can I use chain-of-thought templates for multi-step analysis tasks?

Yes, you can use chain-of-thought templates for multi-step analysis tasks to elicit step-by-step reasoning and self-consistency checks, ensuring reliable transformation and classification outputs across different models.

When should I use template systems and system prompts for LLM tasks?

Use template systems and system prompts for LLM tasks when you need consistent behavior across models, requiring modular templates and conditional sections to enforce safety constraints and model-specific formatting.

Why does my LLM classification pipeline have inconsistent reasoning outputs?

Your LLM classification pipeline has inconsistent reasoning outputs due to lacking structured prompt patterns, which can be fixed by implementing chain-of-thought templates and semantic few-shot example selection.