prompt-engineering

Design structured prompts using CO-STAR and advanced techniques for LLMs.

Updated Aug 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/seqis/OpenClaw-Skills-Converted-From-Claude-Code --skill prompt-engineering-seqis
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: prompt-engineering
Source: https://github.com/seqis/OpenClaw-Skills-Converted-From-Claude-Code/tree/main/skills_tree/prompt-engineering
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/seqis/OpenClaw-Skills-Converted-From-Claude-Code --skill prompt-engineering-seqis

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a comprehensive framework for designing, optimizing, and refining prompts to elicit the best possible responses from Large Language Models (LLMs).

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured Prompt Design: Utilizes the CO-STAR framework for systematic prompt creation.
  • Advanced Techniques: Implements Zero-Shot, Few-Shot, Chain-of-Thought, ReAct, and Tree-of-Thought prompting strategies.
  • Model-Specific Tuning: Offers guidance on optimizing prompts for Claude, GPT-4, Gemini, and open-source models.
  • Use Case: You need to generate marketing copy for a new product. Use this Skill to craft a prompt that specifies the target audience, desired tone, key selling points, and output format, ensuring consistent and effective copy generation.

Quick Start

Use the prompt-engineering skill to design a prompt for generating Python code that sorts a list of numbers.

Frequently Asked Questions about prompt-engineering

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What is the CO-STAR framework for prompt engineering?

The CO-STAR framework is a structured prompt design methodology for LLMs that systematically defines context, objective, style, tone, audience, and response format to generate optimal model outputs.

How do I use few-shot learning and chain-of-thought prompting together?

Few-shot learning provides example inputs and outputs to guide LLM behavior, while chain-of-thought prompting structures those examples to include intermediate reasoning steps for more accurate complex task execution.

Can I use the same prompt optimization techniques for GPT-4, Claude, and Gemini?

Prompt optimization requires model-specific tuning across GPT-4, Claude, and Gemini because each LLM interprets structural constraints and few-shot examples differently, requiring tailored strategies for optimal results.

What is the best way to prevent prompt injection in large language models?

Preventing prompt injection involves designing structured LLM prompts with clear boundaries and utilizing specific evaluation methodologies to test model responses against malicious inputs and unauthorized instruction overrides.

When should I use Tree-of-Thought prompting instead of ReAct?

Use Tree-of-Thought prompting for LLM tasks requiring exploration of multiple reasoning branches, whereas ReAct is better suited for tasks requiring iterative interleaving of reasoning and external action execution.

How do I evaluate the effectiveness of my LLM prompts?

Evaluating LLM prompt effectiveness involves applying systematic evaluation methodologies to assess how well structured frameworks like CO-STAR and chain-of-thought techniques consistently produce the desired target outputs.