prompt-engineering

Refine system prompts, tool descriptions, and skill definitions for WrongStack's 4-layer LLM prompt structure.

224|27|Updated May 12, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/WrongStack/WrongStack --skill prompt-engineering-wrongstack
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: prompt-engineering
Source: https://github.com/WrongStack/WrongStack/tree/main/packages/core/skills/prompt-engineering
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/WrongStack/WrongStack --skill prompt-engineering-wrongstack

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Designers and engineers struggle to craft consistent, safe, and effective system prompts, tool descriptions, and skill definitions for LLM agents. This skill provides guidelines to structure prompts, enforce 4-layer prompt architecture, and avoid common pitfalls.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured prompt guidelines: Defines a disciplined approach to writing identity, tool usage, environment, and volatile layers.
  • Trigger-aware descriptions: Ensures skill descriptions begin with a clear trigger sentence and specify when to use each tool.
  • Quality checks: Provides rules to avoid filler phrases and ensure actionable tool descriptions.

Quick Start

Provide a refined system prompt for a WrongStack agent to improve clarity and reliability in a real-world task.

Frequently Asked Questions about prompt-engineering

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I write effective system prompts for LLM agents?

Effective system prompts require a 4-layer architecture separating identity, tool usage, environment, and volatile context. This structured approach reduces ambiguity and risk by enforcing trigger-based descriptions, explicit rules, and actionable metadata for LLM agents.

How do I structure tool descriptions to ensure LLM agents trigger them correctly?

Tool descriptions must begin with a clear trigger sentence specifying exactly when to use each tool. This trigger-aware structure, combined with explicit rules and structured metadata, ensures LLM agents understand tool usage conditions and avoid filler phrases that cause misfires.

What is the best way to critique and refine prompts for LLM agents?

Critique and refine prompts by applying quality checks against structured guidelines, ensuring trigger-based descriptions, and verifying the 4-layer prompt architecture. This removes filler phrases and enforces actionable tool descriptions to improve clarity and safety.

Why does my LLM agent misinterpret tool descriptions and fail to trigger correctly?

LLM agents misinterpret tool descriptions when they lack explicit trigger sentences or contain filler phrases. Resolving this requires applying trigger-aware descriptions, structured metadata, and explicit rules to ensure the agent understands exactly when to use each tool.

Can I use these prompt engineering guidelines for non-WrongStack LLM workflows?

The guidelines apply to designing, critiquing, and refining system prompts, tool descriptions, and skill definitions across any LLM agent workflow. They enforce trigger-based descriptions and structured metadata to ensure clarity and safety in real development environments.

What are the limitations of using a 4-layer prompt structure for LLM agents?

A 4-layer prompt structure requires maintaining strict separation between identity, tool usage, environment, and volatile layers. When descriptions lack explicit rules or structured metadata, the architecture cannot prevent ambiguity, making disciplined adherence to guidelines essential for safety.