proof-and-analysis-toolkit

Validate code claims with empirical analysis recipes for the Cambridge Beer Festival Flutter app.

2|3|Updated Nov 28, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/richardthe3rd/cambridge-beer-festival-app --skill proof-and-analysis-toolkit
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: proof-and-analysis-toolkit
Source: https://github.com/richardthe3rd/cambridge-beer-festival-app/tree/main/.claude/skills/proof-and-analysis-toolkit
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/richardthe3rd/cambridge-beer-festival-app --skill proof-and-analysis-toolkit

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill eliminates the risk of acting on unproven, vibes-based claims about the Cambridge Beer Festival app codebase, which commonly lead to misclassified data, regressions, and wasted time on incorrect review feedback.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Empirical data census: Count live API field types to validate parsing logic and identify dead code branches.
  • Minified crash forensics: Decode Flutter web release crash stack traces to build exact, frame-by-frame root cause explanations.
  • Async/race audit: Identify unawaited futures and shared state mutation risks that cause flaky, intermittent behavior.
  • Review comment refutation: Construct tooling-backed proofs to dismiss incorrect automated or human review feedback.
  • Staleness/retry semantics analysis: Model cache and network state machines to avoid retry storms or stale data lockouts for offline users.
  • Hypothesis-prediction experiments: Force pre-experiment predictions to catch mismatches between assumed and actual system behavior. A common use case is validating API field type claims before modifying parsing code, or decoding a minified production crash to implement a targeted, minimal fix.

Quick Start

Use the proof-and-analysis-toolkit skill to confirm whether the abv field in the live festival API is always a string before updating the drink parsing logic.

Frequently Asked Questions about proof-and-analysis-toolkit

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I validate live API field types before modifying Flutter parsing logic?

To validate API field types, perform an empirical data census by counting the live API field types to confirm parsing logic and identify dead code branches. This provides count-backed proof rather than plausible assumptions before you modify code.

How do I decode minified Flutter web release crash stack traces?

Decoding minified Flutter web release crash stack traces requires using source maps to build exact, frame-by-frame root cause explanations. This crash forensics process produces targeted, minimal fixes instead of guesswork.

What is the best way to audit async race conditions in a Flutter app?

Auditing async race conditions involves identifying unawaited futures and shared state mutation risks that cause flaky behavior. This first-principles analysis exposes intermittent faults rather than relying on vibes-based assumptions.

How do I refute incorrect automated code review comments with proof?

Refuting incorrect code review comments requires constructing tooling-backed proofs using empirical analysis recipes. This approach dismisses inaccurate automated or human review feedback by validating claims with hard data.

Can I model cache staleness and retry semantics to prevent offline lockouts?

Yes, you can model cache and network state machines to analyze staleness and retry semantics. This prevents retry storms or stale data lockouts for offline users by validating the state logic empirically.

Do I need access to the full codebase and live API for empirical code analysis?

Yes, empirical code analysis requires access to the live API, Flutter SDK source maps, and the full repository codebase. This access is necessary to produce reproducible, count-backed proofs rather than plausible assumptions.