proof-checker

Verify and repair LaTeX mathematical proofs with audit reports.

Updated May 25, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/duypham2801/ThS_LLM --skill proof-checker-duypham2801
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: proof-checker
Source: https://github.com/duypham2801/ThS_LLM/tree/main/.claude/skills/proof-checker
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/duypham2801/ThS_LLM --skill proof-checker-duypham2801

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires bash, read, grep, glob, write, edit, agent, mcp__codex__codex, mcp__codex__codex-reply.

What problem does it solve?

It helps you rigorously verify a mathematical proof, pinpoint gaps (including hypothesis misuse and illegal interchanges), and produce repaired derivations that are re-checked until the proof meets objective acceptance gates.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Proof gap detection with an issue taxonomy: Identifies logical, analytic, parameter-scope, and probability-mode failures such as unjustified assertions, quantifier mistakes, missing domination for DCT/Fubini/Leibniz, and uniformity ambiguity.
  • Iterative repair workflow: Proposes fix strategies (add derivations, strengthen assumptions, weaken claims, or add references), re-derives corrected steps, and generates a traceable audit trail.
  • Audit reporting for traceability: Produces an audit document (including obligation accounting) so you can see what was verified, what remains assumed, and what changed.

Quick Start

Use the proof-checker skill to check the LaTeX proof in your main .tex file by asking it to verify the proof and output a full audit report.

Frequently Asked Questions about proof-checker

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I verify a mathematical proof in LaTeX for logical gaps?

To verify a mathematical proof in LaTeX, the system reads your .tex content, identifies logical gaps through structured cross-model review, and generates a detailed audit report. It checks proof obligations, quantifier scope, and interchange safety.

What types of errors does mathematical proof verification detect?

Mathematical proof verification detects logical, analytic, parameter-scope, and probability-mode failures. This includes unjustified assertions, quantifier mistakes, missing domination for DCT/Fubini/Leibniz interchanges, and uniformity ambiguity across theorem and lemma derivations.

Can I automatically fix and re-derive missing steps in a LaTeX proof?

Yes, you can automatically fix missing steps in a LaTeX proof. The tool proposes fix strategies like adding derivations or strengthening assumptions, re-derives corrected steps with full mathematical derivations, and re-reviews the proof until it meets objective acceptance gates.

How do I generate an audit report for theorem and lemma proofs in a research paper?

You generate an audit report for theorem and lemma proofs by running the verification workflow on your LaTeX research paper. The resulting document provides obligation accounting and a traceable audit trail showing what was verified, what remains assumed, and what changed.

Does proof verification work with probability theory and uniform convergence checks?

Yes, proof verification works with probability theory and uniform convergence checks. It specifically validates uniformity ambiguity and probability-mode failures, ensuring missing domination conditions are caught for DCT, Fubini, and Leibniz interchange safety.