proof-checker

Verify mathematical proofs in LaTeX by running an adversarial cross-model review that identifies missing hypotheses, unverified steps, and improper interchanges. The workflow applies multiple review rounds to ensure rigorous validation and outputs a reproducible audit report.

Cross-model review for mathematical proof checking uses multiple configurable reviewer models to adversarially audit derivations. It enforces explicit hypothesis discharge and interchange auditing, including DCT, MCT, and Fubini, to detect gaps and inconsistencies across multiple rounds.

Yes, automated proof verification applies directly to lecture notes, formal theses, and research papers. It generates traceable micro-claims and a PROOF_AUDIT artifact, ensuring publication readiness by validating correctness and fixing gaps with full derivations.

Audit improper interchanges like DCT or Fubini by applying an interchange auditing process that flags unverified steps in your LaTeX proofs. The workflow enforces explicit hypothesis discharge and generates detailed audit logs for reproducibility.

Generate an audit report for LaTeX proofs by feeding your document into an end-to-end proof-audit workflow. It produces a reproducible PROOF_AUDIT artifact containing detailed micro-claims, audit logs, and reproducible LaTeX-ready outputs for publication readiness.