proof-checker-v2

You can audit a mathematical proof by running an adversarial review pass that locates missing assumptions, unjustified steps, and hidden dependency errors. This process applies rubric-based checking to return a structured verdict with evidence-backed issue reporting.

Adversarial proof verification is an independent review mechanism that checks for illegal interchanges, dependency gaps, circularity, and scope overclaims. It applies rubric-based checking to identify structural errors that might invalidate a completed theorem or lemma proof.

Yes, you can verify LaTeX and Markdown proof artifacts for circularity and scope overclaims. The adversarial review process supports theorem, lemma, proposition, and proof logs in these formats to locate structural errors and unsupported claims.

Yes, proof auditing supports external DeepSeek review routing for theorem verification. This integration enables structured proof review with rubric-based checking, routing completed proofs to DeepSeek for an independent correctness pass and evidence-backed issue reporting.

The best way to check a completed proof draft for quantifier mistakes is to run an independent adversarial review pass. This approach catches hidden assumptions, quantifier errors, and unsupported claims by applying rubric-based verification before the proof is accepted.

Automated proof checking may not be suitable when a proof artifact lacks structured formatting in Markdown, LaTeX, or proof logs, or when the verification workflow cannot support external DeepSeek review routing and rubric-based checking for evidence-backed issue reporting.