proof-review-citation

Reviews final proofs for citation fidelity, object mapping, and assumption discharge.

65|2|Updated Aug 10, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/DechenZhang/VALG-ML-Theory-Agent --skill proof-review-citation-dechenzhang
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: proof-review-citation
Source: https://github.com/DechenZhang/VALG-ML-Theory-Agent/tree/main/skills/proof-review-citation
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/DechenZhang/VALG-ML-Theory-Agent --skill proof-review-citation-dechenzhang

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Final mathematical proofs often rely on cited theorems, dependency steps, and standard facts whose statements, notation, or assumptions may not actually hold in the current setting. This Skill performs a diagnostic citation audit of an assembled proof and its LaTeX bundle, catching source-fidelity errors, notation drift, and undischargeable assumptions before acceptance. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Citation-Use Mapping: Builds a map of every cited theorem, lemma, dependency step, and standard fact across the final proof and LaTeX bundle, recording instantiated objects and discharge locations. - Source Fidelity and Notation Checks: Verifies each cited result exists, supports the exact statement used, and is restated in current-branch notation with correct parameter regimes and explicit-rate dependencies. - Assumption Discharge and Repair Localization: Confirms every hypothesis is discharged from accepted artifacts and emits a verdict with blocking issues, suggested repair depth (assembly, step, sketch, or idea), and the smallest repair target. - Use Case: After running /proof-assembly on a theorem candidate, invoke this reviewer to produce proof_review_citation.md, which flags a LaTeX-only citation missing from reference.bib as blocking and routes the repair to the assembly stage. ## Quick Start Run the proof-review-citation skill on the assembled proof in perspective_M/idea_N to generate a diagnostic proof_review_citation.md verdict.

Frequently Asked Questions about proof-review-citation

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review a proof for citation errors before acceptance?

Run this reviewer after proof assembly to build a citation-use map across the final proof and LaTeX bundle. It checks source fidelity, object mapping, and assumption discharge, then writes proof_review_citation.md with a PASS or BLOCKING verdict.

What inputs does the citation proof reviewer require?

It requires setting.md, the full latex_template bundle, assembly_report.md, accepted proof sketch and review artifacts, a valid diagnostic global proof with accepted review, and accepted proof and review files for every required proof step.

Can the citation reviewer modify proofs or assign repair routing?

No. It is diagnostic only: it cannot modify proofs, sketches, step artifacts, or accepted results, and it does not assign scores, failure types, retry modes, or controller routing. It only emits verdict and repair-depth fields.

What LaTeX citation problems does the reviewer flag as blocking?

It flags missing reference.bib entries for citation commands, unresolved or duplicate labels, internal artifact paths used as public proof citations, vague appeals to standard results without BibTeX-backed citations, and theorem statements that cite appendix-only results.

When does the reviewer suggest step-level versus assembly-level repair?

Assembly depth applies when the accepted step proof contains a valid citation application but the final proof or LaTeX bundle has traceability, labeling, or presentation defects. Step depth applies when an accepted step itself has an invalid citation, notation translation, or assumption discharge.