proof-writer

Converts informal claims into formal LaTeX-ready proofs via a five-stage workflow.

Updated Aug 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/leonardofhy/openclaw-workspace --skill proof-writer-leonardofhy
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: proof-writer
Source: https://github.com/leonardofhy/openclaw-workspace/tree/main/skills/proof-writer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/leonardofhy/openclaw-workspace --skill proof-writer-leonardofhy

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This skill transforms informal mathematical ideas into formal, fully checked proofs using a structured five-stage workflow: claim extraction, literature scanning, strategy selection, step-by-step derivation, and LaTeX typesetting.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Claim extraction: identify and formalize the proposition to prove.
  • Literature scanning: locate relevant lemmas and theorems to support the proof.
  • Strategy selection: choose suitable proof methods (direct, induction, contradiction, etc.).
  • Step-by-step derivation: produce rigorous, justified argument sequences with clear dependencies.
  • LaTeX typesetting: generate publication-ready proof sections ready for inclusion in LaTeX documents.
  • Use Case: drafting a theorem from a manuscript and producing a fully formatted LaTeX proof.

Quick Start

Provide a formal claim and I will generate a complete LaTeX-formatted proof using the five-stage workflow.

Frequently Asked Questions about proof-writer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I convert an informal mathematical claim into a formal LaTeX proof?

To convert an informal claim into a formal LaTeX proof, provide the proposition to trigger a five-stage workflow: claim extraction, literature scanning, strategy selection, step-by-step derivation, and LaTeX typesetting for publication-ready output.

What is the best way to structure a mathematical proof for LaTeX documentation?

The best way to structure a mathematical proof for LaTeX is through a five-stage pipeline that extracts claims, scans literature for supporting lemmas, selects a proof strategy, derives steps with justifications, and typesets the final argument.

How does literature scanning support formal proof writing?

Literature scanning supports formal proof writing by locating relevant lemmas and theorems from references, which are then used to justify each step during the derivation stage. This ensures rigorous argument sequences with clear logical dependencies.

Can I use this formal proof workflow for academic theorem development?

Yes, you can use this formal proof workflow for academic theorem development. It is designed to formalize propositions from manuscripts and produce fully formatted, verifiable LaTeX proof sections suitable for academic papers.

Do I need to provide references to generate a formal mathematical proof?

You need to provide references for notation and existing theorems to support the literature scanning stage. The structured pipeline accesses these references to ensure rigorous justification at each step of the formal proof derivation.

What proof strategies can I use when formalizing mathematical claims?

When formalizing mathematical claims, you can use proof strategies such as direct proof, induction, and contradiction. The strategy selection stage evaluates the formalized proposition and chooses the most suitable method to derive a rigorous, verifiable argument.