proofer

Analyzes grammar, clarity, tone, and consistency of documents and code via command-line file review.

2|Updated Feb 12, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/samdengler/guppi-skills --skill proofer
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: proofer
Source: https://github.com/samdengler/guppi-skills/tree/main/proofer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/samdengler/guppi-skills --skill proofer

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill addresses the need for thorough review and critique of written materials, ensuring clarity, accuracy, and adherence to quality standards before publication or dissemination.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Content Critique: Provides detailed feedback on grammar, clarity, tone, structure, and consistency.
  • Code Review: Analyzes code comments, naming conventions, and documentation quality.
  • Use Case: Before sending a crucial client proposal, use this Skill to perform a comprehensive editorial review, catching any errors and improving overall readability.

Quick Start

Use the proofer skill to review the document located at 'project-proposal.md'.

Frequently Asked Questions about proofer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform an editorial review on a document for grammar and clarity?

An editorial review analyzes grammar, clarity, tone, structure, and consistency in text-based formats. You can execute this review on specific files like 'project-proposal.md' to catch errors and improve readability before publication.

Can I use this proofreading tool to review code comments and documentation?

Yes, this proofreading tool includes code review capabilities that analyze code comments, naming conventions, and documentation quality. It evaluates various text-based formats to ensure your technical documentation meets quality standards.

What's the best way to critique content structure before sending a client proposal?

The best way to critique content structure is to run a comprehensive editorial review on the document file. This process provides detailed feedback on tone, structure, and consistency, ensuring accuracy and readability before dissemination.

Do I need a specific environment to run file-based content quality reviews?

You need an environment that supports command-line execution for file-based content quality reviews. This allows the tool to access and analyze your text documents directly from the system.

What document formats are supported for document critique?

The document critique supports various text-based formats, including markdown files like 'project-proposal.md'. It processes these files to provide detailed feedback on grammar, tone, and consistency.

Why does my content review not catch structural inconsistencies?

If your content review misses structural inconsistencies, ensure the input file is a text-based format. The tool analyzes structure and consistency, but complex formatting or unsupported file types may limit the depth of the critique.