proposal-critic

Name: proposal-critic
Availability: InStock
Author: Zivtech

Evaluate proposals using a structured rubric with assumptions, dependencies, and rollback strategies.

Updated Mar 5, 2026

Search Tags:#feasibility #ADR #RFC #architecture-review #stakeholders #risk-analysis #proposal-review

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/zivtech/react-critic --skill proposal-critic

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: proposal-critic
Source: https://github.com/zivtech/react-critic/tree/main/.claude/skills/proposal-critic
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/zivtech/react-critic --skill proposal-critic

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Evaluates proposals with an evidence-backed, plan-first critique.

Core Features & Use Cases

Structured, rubric-driven evaluation of proposals across Executor, Stakeholder, Skeptic perspectives.
Explicit extraction of key assumptions, dependencies, and risks, with clear rollback and mitigation considerations.
Evidence-backed verdicts with required open questions and escalation where appropriate.

Quick Start

Provide a structured review of a given proposal using the defined rubric.

Frequently Asked Questions about proposal-critic

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I review an architecture decision record for risks and dependencies?▼

Architecture decision record review evaluates proposals using a structured rubric across Executor, Stakeholder, and Skeptic perspectives, extracting key assumptions, dependencies, and risks to deliver an evidence-backed verdict with required open questions.

What is the best way to critique a migration plan in a React or Next.js ecosystem?▼

Critiquing a migration plan in React or Next.js ecosystems applies an evidence-backed, plan-first critique to enforce a structured rubric, ensuring explicit rollback strategies, mitigation considerations, and measurable success criteria are present.

Can I use a structured rubric to evaluate RFCs and identify missing rollback strategies?▼

Evaluating RFCs with a structured rubric extracts explicit assumptions and dependencies, checks for clear rollback and mitigation considerations, and enforces measurable success criteria to produce an evidence-backed verdict.

Does feasibility analysis for React Native architecture decisions require explicit success criteria?▼

Feasibility analysis for React Native architecture decisions enforces measurable success criteria within a structured rubric, evaluating proposals from Stakeholder and Skeptic perspectives to deliver evidence-backed verdicts with escalation where appropriate.

How to extract assumptions and open questions from a technical proposal review?▼

Technical proposal review extracts key assumptions, dependencies, and risks by applying a structured evaluation rubric, resulting in evidence-backed verdicts that mandate open questions and necessary escalations.

When should I not use an evidence-backed critique for RFC evaluation?▼

Evidence-backed critique for RFC evaluation should be avoided when a proposal lacks sufficient documentation to define explicit assumptions, dependencies, and measurable success criteria required by the structured rubric.