Grades student research proposals using the Hug & Aeschbach rubric.
npx skills add https://github.com/mcmespinaa/scholar-support --skill proposal-grader
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: proposal-grader Source: https://github.com/mcmespinaa/scholar-support/tree/main/skills/proposal-grader Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mcmespinaa/scholar-support --skill proposal-grader
Evaluates research proposal drafts against a standardized rubric, producing a structured assessment and actionable revision priorities to improve grading outcomes.
Provide the draft proposal file path or pasted text to be graded using the default Hug & Aeschbach rubric.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
To grade a research proposal, provide the draft text or file path to apply the standardized Hug & Aeschbach rubric, which scores dimensions like originality, relevance, and soundness to generate a predicted A–F grade.
Rubric-based assessment for academic writing evaluates proposals across multiple dimensions such as alignment, quality, and feasibility. This approach uses structured criteria to produce actionable revision guidance and a clear predicted grade for students.
To get structured feedback on a research methods proposal, input the draft text to receive a report highlighting strengths and actionable revision priorities. The assessment aligns with an adaptable rubric suitable for any methods course.
The grading system applies the default Hug & Aeschbach rubric but is adaptable for any research methods course. It scores seven dimensions to produce a structured assessment and targeted revision guidance for students.
Research proposal grading evaluates seven dimensions: originality, relevance, soundness, alignment, quality, and feasibility. Scoring these areas reveals strengths and revision priorities to generate a predicted A–F grade and structured feedback.
Victory-HugoEvaluate scholarly work across multiple quality dimensions using the ScholarEval framework.
tae0yGrade technical content quality with A-F assessments for clarity and pedagogy.
vvieira010-pixelDesign single-point rubrics with evidence columns for strengths and growth areas.
sagunkayasthaEvaluate manuscripts and grant proposals using checklist-based peer review criteria.
