prose-writer

To generate academic survey prose, provide an approved outline and collected evidence so the system can synthesize sources into structured drafts. It ensures each section includes a thesis, contrasts, and evaluation anchors based strictly on your verified evidence.

Citation management during literature review drafting strictly uses verified citation keys from your provided `citations/ref.bib` file. This mechanism prevents the system from inventing facts or references, ensuring all generated prose is backed by verifiable academic sources.

Yes, you need JSONL files to start writing survey sections. The core drafting process requires input artifacts like `subsection_briefs.jsonl` for outlines and `evidence_drafts.jsonl` for evidence packs to generate verifiable academic prose.

The best way to ensure structured argumentation in evidence synthesis is to use an automated drafting tool that enforces a specific narrative structure. This guarantees each generated section contains a clear thesis, contrasts, evaluation anchors, and stated limitations.

No, you cannot use this approach for literature surveys without an approved outline. The drafting process is designed to synthesize evidence based on predefined subsection briefs, ensuring the generated narrative adheres to your intended academic structure.

A key limitation of automated prose generation for academic writing is its strict dependency on pre-supplied citation files and evidence JSONLs. It avoids inventing facts, meaning it cannot generate creative narrative content outside the boundaries of your provided evidence pack.