pua-debugging

Guide systematic diagnosis and verification of recurring task failures.

1|2|Updated Feb 28, 2026

Search Tags:#automation #debugging #root-cause-analysis #failure-analysis #systematic-debugging #proactivity

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/zhangdszq/vk-skills --skill pua-debugging-zhangdszq

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: pua-debugging
Source: https://github.com/zhangdszq/vk-skills/tree/main/debugging
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/zhangdszq/vk-skills --skill pua-debugging-zhangdszq

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Solves debugging paralysis by providing a proactive, end-to-end problem-solving framework that ensures issues are diagnosed comprehensively and resolved with accountability.

Core Features & Use Cases

Proactive debugging flow: stepwise diagnosis from failure signals to root-cause fixes, with an owner mindset.
End-to-end verification: checks for completeness, regression, and cross-file consistency to prevent surface-level fixes.
Use Case: when a task repeatedly fails, this skill guides you through evidence gathering, hypothesis testing, and structured remediation across code, config, and deployment scenarios.

Quick Start

Run the pua-debugging workflow when you encounter a recurring failure to systematically diagnose, verify, and resolve the issue end-to-end.

Frequently Asked Questions about pua-debugging

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I fix recurring task failures when I don't know where to start debugging?▼

To fix recurring task failures, you need a systematic debugging framework that guides you through evidence gathering, hypothesis validation, and end-to-end verification. This prevents debugging paralysis by enforcing a stepwise diagnosis from failure signals to root-cause fixes with an owner mindset.

What is the best way to perform root-cause-analysis on configuration and deployment failures?▼

Root-cause-analysis for configuration and deployment failures requires a proactive approach that reads failure signals and searches original materials to validate hypotheses. It applies a structured checklist to ensure diagnostic steps are automated and comprehensively verify issues across code, config, and data.

Can I use an automated debugging workflow for cross-file consistency checks?▼

Yes, an automated debugging workflow can perform cross-file consistency checks by applying structured checklists for end-to-end verification. This ensures completeness and prevents surface-level fixes by validating regression and consistency across code, configuration, and deployment scenarios.

How does systematic debugging prevent surface-level fixes during data analysis?▼

Systematic debugging prevents surface-level fixes by enforcing end-to-end verification with structured checklists after hypothesis validation. It ensures issues in data analysis or code are resolved with accountability by checking for completeness, regression, and cross-file consistency before considering the task complete.

Why does my debugging process stall when a task repeatedly fails across different environments?▼

Debugging stalls when tasks repeatedly fail because of a lack of systematic verification and proactive evidence gathering. Applying an end-to-end problem-solving framework resolves this paralysis by automating diagnostic steps, validating hypotheses, and verifying fixes across code, config, and deployment environments.