pua

Diagnose and resolve stubborn engineering tasks through structured debugging.

Updated Apr 8, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/KYRIE66nb/codex-omx-public-config --skill pua-kyrie66nb
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: pua
Source: https://github.com/KYRIE66nb/codex-omx-public-config/tree/main/home/.codex/skills/pua-skill
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/KYRIE66nb/codex-omx-public-config --skill pua-kyrie66nb

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

The PUA-driven skill provides a structured, proactive framework to overcome stalled tasks by enforcing exhaustive problem solving, ownership, and systematic debugging.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • End-to-end problem solving with proactive ownership: when tasks stall, the Skill drives investigation, multiple hypotheses, and verification.
  • Structured failure modes and flavor adaptations to escalate issues and improve delivery under pressure.
  • A repeatable playbook (three iron rules, proactivity levels, and a five-step diagnostic flow) you can apply to code, config, research, or deployment tasks.

Quick Start

Describe your current task and immediately apply the strongest PUA flavor to drive end-to-end resolution.

Frequently Asked Questions about pua

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I debug stubborn engineering failures when tasks stall and environments are problematic?

Debug stubborn engineering failures by applying a five-step diagnostic flow, forming multiple hypotheses, and enforcing evidence-based verification to drive stalled tasks to resolution.

What is the best structured debugging process for complex code, configuration, or deployment tasks?

A structured debugging process requires three iron rules, escalating proactivity levels, and systematic evidence gathering to resolve complex code, configuration, or deployment tasks.

Can I apply proactive ownership principles to research and writing tasks, not just infrastructure?

Yes, proactive ownership principles apply directly to research, writing, and infrastructure tasks, forcing exhaustive problem solving and structured failure mode analysis across any stalled workflow.

Does this exhaustive problem-solving approach work for persistent deployment failures and problematic environments?

Yes, this approach resolves persistent deployment failures and problematic environments by adapting structured failure modes and escalating proactive investigation until evidence-based verification succeeds.

Why does my engineering task keep failing despite multiple attempted fixes?

Your engineering task keeps failing because it lacks a systematic diagnostic flow, relying on ad-hoc attempts instead of exhaustive hypothesis testing and evidence-based verification.

What are the limitations of using a forced proactive ownership approach for everyday engineering tasks?

Forced proactive ownership is limited by its heavy overhead; it is designed for complex, stalled tasks rather than simple, routine engineering tasks that require quick execution.