qa

To turn bug reports into GitHub issues, the agent asks targeted clarifying questions during conversational intake to confirm expected versus actual behavior. It then generates durable, user-focused issues containing mandatory reproduction steps from the reporter's perspective.

Scoping a complex bug report involves analyzing the reported symptoms and desired outcomes to determine if the problem requires a single issue or a breakdown into multiple thinner issues. This scope-aware triage enables parallel fixes across the codebase.

Codebase exploration helps write better GitHub issues by learning the project's domain language and intended behavior. This background exploration ensures the final issue text uses accurate terminology and avoids exposing stale internal implementation references.

Yes, you can use conversational QA intake to report intermittent failures. The agent captures both consistent and intermittent symptoms, asks targeted clarifying questions to distinguish expected behavior, and translates the session into a structured issue.

You should not include internal implementation references in a bug report when writing user-focused GitHub issues. The agent enforces issue-writing rules that strip stale internal details, ensuring the report remains durable and centered on reproducible behavior.

Yes, the QA intake process triages bug scope automatically. After clarifying expectations and capturing reproduction steps, the agent decides whether to file a single issue or split the report into multiple thinner issues for parallel resolution.