qa

Test web applications systematically, detect bugs, and validate fixes.

Updated Mar 28, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/mattothomas/sp26_hackpsu --skill qa-mattothomas
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: qa
Source: https://github.com/mattothomas/sp26_hackpsu/tree/main/.claude/skills/gstack/qa
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mattothomas/sp26_hackpsu --skill qa-mattothomas

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

QA tests a web application systematically, detects bugs, and validates fixes.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Systematic QA cycles with repeatable tests
  • Atomic commits for each bug fix and re-verification
  • Ship-readiness reporting with before/after health scores

Quick Start

Run a QA cycle on the target web app, fix each bug atomically, and re-verify until ship-ready.

Frequently Asked Questions about qa

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate web testing and verify bug fixes systematically?

Automated web testing runs repeatable test cycles, detects bugs, and re-verifies after each fix. It generates before and after evidence, calculates health scores, and reports ship-readiness to ensure your application is deployment ready.

What is ship-readiness reporting and how does it validate regression testing?

Ship-readiness reporting evaluates regression testing by producing before and after health scores. It validates each atomic bug fix through re-verification cycles, ensuring web application stability before deployment using generated test evidence.

Can I run targeted QA tests instead of exhaustive feature verification?

Yes, you can run quick targeted testing or exhaustive verification across features. Both modes detect bugs, validate fixes atomically, and generate structured QA reports with evidence for your web application.

Do I need Bash and file editing tools to generate QA evidence reports?

Yes, generating QA evidence reports requires Bash, Read, Write, Edit, Glob, Grep, AskUserQuestion, and WebSearch tools. These tools execute tests, capture before and after evidence, and produce structured ship-readiness reports.

What is the best way to fix bugs atomically during a QA cycle?

The best way to fix bugs atomically is applying one fix per commit, then re-verifying tests immediately. This systematic QA cycle generates before and after health scores, confirming ship-readiness for each bug fix.

Can I generate a QA report without running new tests?

Yes, a /qa-only mode supports report-only runs. It generates structured QA documentation and ship-readiness health scores from existing test evidence without executing new bug detection or verification cycles.