qa-nfr-quality-review

Identify and assess non-functional requirements across reliability, performance, security, maintainability, observability, and scalability.

Updated Mar 22, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/FernanSuoza/AIDD-project-bootstrap --skill qa-nfr-quality-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: qa-nfr-quality-review
Source: https://github.com/FernanSuoza/AIDD-project-bootstrap/tree/main/templates/skills/qa-nfr-quality-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/FernanSuoza/AIDD-project-bootstrap --skill qa-nfr-quality-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Non-functional requirements (NFRs) are often overlooked but critical for system success. This skill helps teams identify, assess, and track NFRs across reliability, performance, security, maintainability, observability, and scalability.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • NFR identification & assessment: Systematically categorize and prioritize quality attributes.
  • Gap analysis & follow-up: Highlight gaps and generate actionable follow-up work linked to ADRs and stories.
  • Guided cross-references: Suggest referrals to sec-risk-security-review for security concerns and qa-verification-planner for test design.

Quick Start

Run the qa-nfr-quality-review skill to perform a structured NFR assessment for the current project scope.

Frequently Asked Questions about qa-nfr-quality-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I identify and assess non-functional requirements for architecture changes?

Non-functional requirements assessment systematically identifies and evaluates quality attributes like reliability, performance, security, maintainability, observability, and scalability to ensure architecture readiness and track identified gaps.

What is the best way to trace non-functional requirements to ADRs and test stories?

Tracing non-functional requirements to ADRs and stories involves mapping assessed quality attributes directly to architecture decision records and user stories, ensuring verification coverage and highlighting actionable follow-up work for gap closure.

How do I perform a structured NFR review for release readiness?

A structured NFR review for release readiness evaluates system reliability, performance, security, maintainability, observability, and scalability, identifying quality gaps and generating recommended follow-up work linked to project dashboards.

When do I need a non-functional requirement quality review for a redesign effort?

You need a non-functional requirement quality review for redesign efforts when assessing changes to reliability, performance, security, maintainability, observability, and scalability to identify risks and ensure traceability to tests and ADRs.

Can I cross-reference non-functional requirement gaps with security risk and verification planning?

Yes, non-functional requirement gaps can be cross-referenced with security risk reviews for security concerns and verification planners for test design, providing guided referrals to ensure comprehensive architecture quality assessment.