qa-only

Identify and report web application defects with health score, screenshots, and repro steps.

2|Updated Apr 4, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/adityasingh2400/SwarmSell --skill qa-only-adityasingh2400
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: qa-only
Source: https://github.com/adityasingh2400/SwarmSell/tree/main/.claude/skills/qa-only
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/adityasingh2400/SwarmSell --skill qa-only-adityasingh2400

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Report-only QA testing. Systematically tests a web application and produces a structured report with health score, screenshots, and repro steps — but never fixes anything. Use when asked to "just report bugs", "qa report only", or "test but don't fix". For the full test-fix-verify loop, use /qa instead. Proactively suggest when the user wants a bug report without any code changes. (gstack)

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Generate a health score and a reproducible bug report without modifying code.
  • Capture and attach screenshots, logs, and reproduction steps for quick triage across PRs and deployments.
  • Use Case: you want to verify a new build by producing a concise, shareable QA report that highlights regressions without applying any fixes.

Quick Start

Run a quick report-only QA pass on the target web app to produce a health score, screenshots, and reproducible steps without applying any fixes.

Frequently Asked Questions about qa-only

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I generate a bug report for a web application without applying any code fixes?

To generate a bug report without fixes, you can run a report-only QA pass. This systematically tests the web application and produces a structured report with a health score, screenshots, and reproducible steps while ensuring no code is modified.

What is included in a structured QA report for release verification?

A structured QA report for release verification includes an application health score, captured screenshots, logs, and detailed reproduction steps. This provides shareable evidence of regressions across multiple pages and states during your testing process.

Can I use this report-only QA approach for ad-hoc testing and regression checks?

Yes, you can use report-only QA for ad-hoc testing, regression checks, and release verification. It executes tests across multiple pages and states to gather evidence and present findings without performing any fixes or altering the application code.

What is the difference between report-only QA and a full test-fix-verify loop?

Report-only QA strictly identifies and surfaces bugs with reproduction steps and a health score without modifying code. A full test-fix-verify loop goes further by applying code changes to resolve the identified defects before verifying the fixes.

How do I capture screenshots and reproducible steps during a QA pass?

You capture screenshots and reproducible steps by running a report-only QA pass using allowed tools to execute tests. The process automatically gathers evidence, attaches screenshots, and logs reproduction steps into a portable, shareable format.

When should I use a report-only QA pass instead of a full testing workflow?

Use a report-only QA pass when you need to verify a new build or highlight regressions without applying fixes. It is ideal when you want a concise, shareable bug report with a health score rather than an automated code modification workflow.