qa-only

Produce report-only QA evidence with reproduction steps and screenshots.

779|80|Updated Jun 20, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Haohao-end/openagent --skill qa-only-haohao-end
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: qa-only
Source: https://github.com/Haohao-end/openagent/tree/main/api/internal/core/skills/catalog/qa-only
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Haohao-end/openagent --skill qa-only-haohao-end

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It helps teams validate whether a page or workflow has issues by producing an organized QA report with clear evidence, without attempting to change or repair anything.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Report-only QA testing: Collects potential problems and compiles results into a structured deliverable rather than applying fixes.
  • Evidence capture for reproducibility: Documents reproduction steps, screenshots, and impact scope to speed up investigation.
  • Exploratory QA support: Works well when the goal is discovery and assessment, such as exploratory browser-based testing.

Quick Start

Ask the AI to run a report-only QA pass on the target page and produce a structured issue report with reproduction steps, screenshots, and a problem checklist.

Frequently Asked Questions about qa-only

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What is report-only QA testing and when do I need it?

Report-only QA testing is an exploratory browser testing process that discovers UI or workflow defects and compiles a structured findings document. You need it when you want bug evidence and impact assessment without applying automated fixes or code changes.

How do I document reproduction steps for a suspected UI defect?

To document reproduction steps for a suspected UI defect, run an exploratory browser testing pass that records the exact actions taken, captures screenshots, and compiles a structured QA report detailing the problem checklist and affected scope.

Can I use this for exploratory browser testing without applying code fixes?

Yes, you can use this for exploratory browser testing because it follows a strict no-fix workflow. It validates pages, captures bug evidence like screenshots and reproduction steps, and outputs a structured QA report without attempting any remediation.

What is the best way to compile bug evidence for a structured QA report?

The best way to compile bug evidence for a structured QA report is to run a report-only QA pass that discovers problems, records reproduction steps, captures screenshots, and assesses the affected scope into a single deliverable for investigation.

Does browser testing for bug evidence require any specific testing frameworks?

Browser testing for bug evidence requires no specific testing frameworks or dependencies. It operates as a standalone exploratory testing session to validate pages and produce a structured findings document with reproduction steps and screenshots.

Why collect screenshots and reproduction steps instead of fixing bugs directly?

Collecting screenshots and reproduction steps instead of fixing bugs directly speeds up investigation by providing clear, structured bug evidence. This report-only approach assesses impact scope and documents defects without the risk of introducing automated remediation errors.