qa-only

Identify and report web application issues with reproducible steps and screenshots.

Updated Mar 22, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/jeisenback/original-curse-killer --skill qa-only-jeisenback
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: qa-only
Source: https://github.com/jeisenback/original-curse-killer/tree/main/.claude/skills/qa-only
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/jeisenback/original-curse-killer --skill qa-only-jeisenback

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

QA teams often need to observe an application without making changes and produce formal, evidence-backed reports. This Skill enforces a no-fix policy and focuses on finding and documenting issues instead.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Non-invasive testing: Explore the app manually, capture findings with reproducible steps, and assemble a structured report.
  • Evidence-driven reporting: Attach screenshots and logs to issues; no code changes are made.
  • Use Case: A tester wants to report a UI misalignment or a broken form without attempting fixes, ensuring stakeholders receive a complete bug dossier.

Quick Start

Launch the qa-only workflow in your browser, explore the application, and generate a structured bug report with evidence.

Frequently Asked Questions about qa-only

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I generate a structured bug report with reproducible steps for a web application?

A structured bug report enforces a no-fix policy during manual exploratory testing, capturing reproducible steps, UI misalignments, broken forms, and evidence like screenshots to provide stakeholders with a complete issue dossier.

Can I perform manual exploratory testing without altering production code?

Yes, non-invasive manual exploratory testing allows you to observe a web application without altering production code, focusing strictly on identifying issues and documenting findings rather than implementing fixes.

What is evidence-driven QA reporting and when do I need it?

Evidence-driven QA reporting documents issues by attaching screenshots and logs to reproducible steps. You need it when formal, evidence-backed bug documentation is required for stakeholder review without implementing fixes.

Does this approach work for testing small UI components as well as full web platforms?

Yes, this manual exploratory testing approach applies to any web application scale, from small UI components to full platforms, ensuring consistent evidence-rich reporting and structured issue documentation.

What are the limitations of report-only QA testing?

The primary limitation of report-only QA testing is its strict no-fix policy; it identifies and documents issues with evidence but does not implement code changes or resolve the underlying bugs.