qa-only

Identify web application defects and generate a structured report with health score and repro steps.

1|1|Updated Mar 28, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/nuurpro/Converza_ai --skill qa-only-nuurpro
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: qa-only
Source: https://github.com/nuurpro/Converza_ai/tree/main/.claude/skills/qa-only
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/nuurpro/Converza_ai --skill qa-only-nuurpro

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Non-intrusive QA testing that verifies a web application by identifying defects and compiling a structured report with a health score, evidence screenshots, and reproducible steps without making any code changes.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured defect reporting with health score, screenshots, and repro steps.
  • Non-fix QA cycles for bug discovery, regression checks, and quality assurance reviews.
  • Use case: run a test pass on a new build and hand developers a ready-to-action report.

Quick Start

Run a full QA pass on the target web app to generate a reproducible defect report with evidence.

Frequently Asked Questions about qa-only

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I generate a structured bug report for a web application without modifying the source code?

To generate a structured bug report for a web application without modifying source code, run a non-intrusive QA testing pass that identifies defects and compiles evidence with screenshots and reproducible steps.

What is the best way to perform a regression check that provides developers with actionable evidence?

The best way to perform a regression check providing actionable evidence is to run a non-fix QA cycle that identifies defects and outputs a health score alongside screenshots and reproduce steps.

How does a QA health score help in evaluating web application builds?

A QA health score helps evaluate web application builds by summarizing the defect severity found during a testing pass, giving developers and product teams a clear metric to assess build quality.

Can I use this approach for bug hunts where I need quick and repeatable evidence?

Yes, you can use this approach for bug hunts because it is specifically designed to produce quick, repeatable evidence such as screenshots and reproducible steps without applying any code fixes.

What should I expect to receive in a defect report when running a non-fix QA cycle?

When running a non-fix QA cycle, you should expect to receive a structured defect report containing a health score, evidence screenshots, reproduce steps, and references for developers.

When should I not use a non-intrusive QA testing pass for my web app?

You should not use a non-intrusive QA testing pass when your web app requires immediate code changes or automated fixes during the testing cycle, as this process strictly reports defects without applying fixes.