qa-only

Test a web application and generate a structured QA report with health score, screenshots, and reproducible steps.

Updated Mar 24, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/pcaokhai/gradion-response-report-api --skill qa-only-pcaokhai
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: qa-only
Source: https://github.com/pcaokhai/gradion-response-report-api/tree/main/.claude/skills/gstack/qa-only
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/pcaokhai/gradion-response-report-api --skill qa-only-pcaokhai

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Many teams struggle to capture comprehensive QA feedback without making code changes, leading to vague bug reports and unclear repro steps. This skill provides a fixed, report-only QA workflow that generates a structured QA report with a health score, evidence (screenshots), and reproducible steps, while never applying fixes.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured QA reports with health score, screenshots, and reproducible steps
  • Diff-aware analysis on feature branches or full regression passes
  • Non-intrusive: tests run without modifying the source code or app state
  • Output artifacts suitable for project-scoped tracking and hand-off to developers

Quick Start

Request a full QA pass to generate a structured report with health score, evidence, and reproducible steps.

Frequently Asked Questions about qa-only

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I generate a structured QA report with screenshots and reproducible steps for a web app?

To generate a structured QA report with screenshots and reproducible steps, run a report-only QA testing pass that exercises web app interactions and backend endpoints without applying code changes. This produces a markdown report containing a health score and evidence artifacts for tracking.

What is diff-aware QA testing for feature branches?

Diff-aware QA testing for feature branches analyzes only the changed code paths to produce a targeted health score and structured report. It captures screenshots and reproducible steps without modifying the source, ensuring non-intrusive validation for incremental updates.

Can I run automated regression tests without modifying my source code?

Yes, you can run automated regression tests without modifying source code using a report-only QA workflow. It leverages browser automation to test pages and interactions, outputting a markdown report and project-scoped artifact with evidence while keeping app state untouched.

Does web app QA testing require a separate browser automation tool to capture bug report evidence?

Web app QA testing requires a browser automation tool, a report template, and a method to capture evidence to function properly. These components work together to produce the structured markdown report, health score, and project-scoped artifacts needed for developer hand-off.

What is the best way to capture reproducible steps and a health score during web app testing?

The best way to capture reproducible steps and a health score is using a fixed, non-intrusive QA workflow that outputs a structured markdown report. It systematically covers pages, interactions, and backend endpoints, generating project-scoped artifacts suitable for developer hand-off.

Why are my QA bug reports missing clear reproducible steps and structured evidence?

QA bug reports often lack clear reproducible steps and structured evidence when testing is done without a fixed reporting workflow. Generating a standardized markdown report with screenshots, a health score, and precise repro steps ensures comprehensive feedback without applying fixes.