qa-quarto

Compare Quarto HTML slides against Beamer PDF benchmarks for content parity.

1|Updated Mar 13, 2026

Search Tags:#quality assurance #qa #comparison #slides #quarto #beamer

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/AndreaMentasti/tweet-election --skill qa-quarto-andreamentasti

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: qa-quarto
Source: https://github.com/AndreaMentasti/tweet-election/tree/main/.claude/skills/qa-quarto
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/AndreaMentasti/tweet-election --skill qa-quarto-andreamentasti

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the rigorous comparison of Quarto-generated slides against their Beamer PDF benchmarks, ensuring visual fidelity and content parity.

Core Features & Use Cases

Adversarial QA: Compares Quarto HTML slides against Beamer PDF benchmarks.
Iterative Fixing: Automatically identifies and attempts to fix discrepancies.
Hard Gate Enforcement: Ensures critical elements like content overflow, plot quality, and notation fidelity are met.
Use Case: Automatically verify that a Quarto presentation accurately reflects the content and quality of its Beamer counterpart, catching errors before publication.

Quick Start

Run the qa-quarto skill to compare the Quarto slides for lecture 1 against its Beamer benchmark.

Frequently Asked Questions about qa-quarto

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I check if my Quarto HTML slides match the content of my Beamer PDF benchmarks?▼

To check if Quarto slides match Beamer benchmarks, you can automate an adversarial comparison process. This skill enforces content parity by running iterative critic-fixer loops that audit visual fidelity and hard gates for content discrepancies.

What is the best way to automate visual regression testing for Quarto presentations against Beamer?▼

Automating visual regression testing for Quarto against Beamer requires an adversarial QA loop. It enforces hard gates for plot quality, slide centering, and overflow, automatically identifying and attempting to fix visual discrepancies over a maximum of five iteration rounds.

Does automated Quarto and Beamer comparison catch mathematical notation fidelity issues?▼

Yes, automated Quarto and Beamer comparison catches mathematical notation fidelity issues. The process enforces hard gates specifically for notation fidelity alongside content parity, ensuring that mathematical rendering in Quarto HTML accurately reflects the Beamer PDF benchmark.

How does the iterative fixing process work when comparing Quarto slides to Beamer?▼

The iterative fixing process works by running a critic-fixer loop for up to five rounds. It performs pre-flight checks, audits discrepancies, attempts automated fixes for overflow and content parity, and generates a final report if hard gates remain unmet.

What limitations exist when automating Quarto and Beamer slide parity checks?▼

A key limitation of automating Quarto and Beamer parity checks is the iteration cap. The adversarial critic-fixer loop runs for a maximum of five rounds, meaning complex discrepancies involving content overflow or plot quality may remain unresolved if they require more iterations.

Do I need pre-existing Beamer PDFs to run quality assurance on Quarto slides?▼

Yes, you need pre-existing Beamer PDFs to run quality assurance on Quarto slides. The skill operates by comparing Quarto HTML slides against these Beamer PDF benchmarks, using them as the reference standard to enforce content parity and visual fidelity.