qa-quarto

To check if Quarto slides match Beamer benchmarks, you can automate an adversarial comparison process. This skill enforces content parity by running iterative critic-fixer loops that audit visual fidelity and hard gates for content discrepancies.

Automating visual regression testing for Quarto against Beamer requires an adversarial QA loop. It enforces hard gates for plot quality, slide centering, and overflow, automatically identifying and attempting to fix visual discrepancies over a maximum of five iteration rounds.

Yes, automated Quarto and Beamer comparison catches mathematical notation fidelity issues. The process enforces hard gates specifically for notation fidelity alongside content parity, ensuring that mathematical rendering in Quarto HTML accurately reflects the Beamer PDF benchmark.

The iterative fixing process works by running a critic-fixer loop for up to five rounds. It performs pre-flight checks, audits discrepancies, attempts automated fixes for overflow and content parity, and generates a final report if hard gates remain unmet.

A key limitation of automating Quarto and Beamer parity checks is the iteration cap. The adversarial critic-fixer loop runs for a maximum of five rounds, meaning complex discrepancies involving content overflow or plot quality may remain unresolved if they require more iterations.

Yes, you need pre-existing Beamer PDFs to run quality assurance on Quarto slides. The skill operates by comparing Quarto HTML slides against these Beamer PDF benchmarks, using them as the reference standard to enforce content parity and visual fidelity.