Qdebate

Structure multi-round, multi-agent debates to surface tradeoffs and decision rationale.

6|Updated Mar 14, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/inho-team/qe-framework --skill qdebate
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: Qdebate
Source: https://github.com/inho-team/qe-framework/tree/main/skills/Qdebate
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/inho-team/qe-framework --skill qdebate

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Structured debate on topics using multiple AI agents to surface tradeoffs, rationales, and robust perspectives for decision making.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-round, multi-agent debates with independent sides and staged arguments.
  • Mode routing: agent-vs-agent, codex-vs-claude, or self-debate with configurable rounds.
  • Deliverables: synthesized summary, strongest tradeoffs, and an ADR-ready decision context.

Quick Start

Provide a topic and optional mode and rounds to initiate a structured multi-agent debate.

Frequently Asked Questions about Qdebate

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run a multi-agent debate to surface decision tradeoffs?

To run a multi-agent debate, provide a topic, select a mode like agent-vs-agent or codex-vs-claude, and configure the rounds. The system orchestrates staged arguments across independent sides and synthesizes a final summary highlighting the strongest tradeoffs.

What is structured multi-agent debate and when should I use it for decisions?

Structured multi-agent debate is a process where multiple AI agents argue independent sides of a topic across multiple rounds. Use it for product, engineering, or policy decisions to surface robust rationales and tradeoffs that a single perspective might miss.

Can I use different AI models like Codex and Claude for opposing debate sides?

Yes, you can route different models for opposing sides using the codex-vs-claude debate mode. This allows you to leverage distinct model perspectives to evaluate design tradeoffs or policy choices.

What is the best way to get an ADR-ready decision context from an AI debate?

The best way to get an ADR-ready decision context is to run a configured multi-round debate. The system automatically synthesizes the arguments into a final summary, extracting the strongest tradeoffs and rationale needed for architecture decision records.

How do I configure debate rounds and assign sides in a self-debate mode?

You can configure the number of rounds and assign sides by providing optional parameters when initiating the debate. In self-debate mode, a single agent argues against itself across multiple rounds to stress-test a specific position.

Does multi-agent debate require external dependencies or components to function?

No external dependencies or components are required to run structured multi-agent debates. The system handles agent orchestration, side assignment, round management, and final synthesis internally.