Audit code quality across 12 dimensions with evidence-based scoring.
npx skills add https://github.com/oakoss/agent-skills --skill quality-auditor-oakoss
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: quality-auditor Source: https://github.com/oakoss/agent-skills/tree/main/skills/quality-auditor Command: npx skills add https://github.com/oakoss/agent-skills --skill quality-auditor-oakoss
This Skill addresses the challenge of objectively evaluating code quality, especially AI-generated code, by providing a structured, evidence-based auditing process across multiple critical dimensions.
Run a quality audit on the current project directory using the quality-auditor skill.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
To audit AI-generated code, you need an evidence-based evaluation process that scores code quality across 12 critical dimensions. This enforces strict quality gates to verify AI output against industry standards before merging.
Evidence-based code quality scoring assigns objective scores to a codebase by evaluating 12 weighted dimensions including architecture, security, and performance. It identifies concrete evidence for strengths and weaknesses rather than relying on subjective opinions.
Yes, a comprehensive codebase evaluation assesses technical debt by examining architecture, code quality, and developer experience. It provides a structured audit with detailed rubrics to objectively measure accumulated debt across the project.
An automated code review evaluates security and performance as two of 12 weighted dimensions in its audit. It analyzes the codebase against detailed rubrics to ensure these critical standards are met before enforcing strict quality gates.
The best way to perform a pre-commit audit is running a comprehensive evaluation against 12 weighted quality dimensions. This ensures the feature branch meets security, performance, and maintainability standards through evidence-based scoring before integration.
Your codebase evaluation needs detailed rubrics and scoring scales to ensure objective, evidence-based assessment. Without strict quality gates and standardized rubrics, code quality audits risk subjective bias and inconsistent enforcement of industry standards.
aaronlordAudit static context files and update project documentation using git and grep.
gaoqiongxieAudit codebases to detect orphan code, duplicate logic, and documentation gaps.
eliottbusinessAutomate pre-commit code review with static analysis and security scanning.
galangryandanaVerify code-review feedback against the codebase before implementing changes.
