Identify and report quality issues in declassified case narratives.
npx skills add https://github.com/pr3t3l/openclaw-config --skill quality-auditor-pr3t3l
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: quality-auditor Source: https://github.com/pr3t3l/openclaw-config/tree/main/workspace/skills/quality-auditor Command: npx skills add https://github.com/pr3t3l/openclaw-config --skill quality-auditor-pr3t3l
QA teams require a repeatable, non-invasive way to assess narrative coherence, evidentiary logic, and document relevance across declassified case materials.
Run the quality-auditor after the orchestrator completes case-plan validation to generate the QA report.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
To audit declassified case narratives without altering files, apply a non-invasive quality-auditor mode. It assesses narrative coherence and evidentiary logic, producing standardized QA reports that highlight issues for human review without modifying the original documents.
Narrative depth auditing is a validation mode that checks evidentiary logic and document relevance across declassified case materials. It requires hooks into case-plan data and clue catalogs to assess whether the narrative structure meets quality standards.
You should run automated validation steps after orchestrator pipeline phases and case-plan validation complete. Running the quality-auditor at this stage ensures that the generated QA reports capture narrative issues based on fully assembled case materials.
Yes, the quality-auditor supports playthrough scenarios alongside narrative_quality and narrative_depth modes. These modes validate case materials by applying checks to narrative plans and automated validation steps triggered after pipeline phases.
Structured QA reports for declassified cases contain identified quality issues in narrative plans, evidentiary logic, and document relevance. They are generated for human review and do not include automated fixes, focusing solely on issue detection.
brandonavantSynthesize observation data into a case study draft and improvement plan.
GDSDNApply code fixes from QA feedback reports with automated validation.
kjgarzaCritique scientific study design, biases, and evidentiary strength using structured criteria.
wahabmalikAutomate skeptical content review and produce structured Markdown findings reports.
