quality-checklist

Code reviews benefit from structured checklists enforcing consistent quality standards. This Skill provides a comprehensive quality checklist covering UI strings, icons, configuration, colors, logging, naming conventions, and documentation to ensure reviewers apply the same criteria across all changes.

Beyond logic, reviewers should validate naming conventions, comments, documentation, UI resource consistency, localization strings, configuration values, color usage, logging calls, and changelog entries. This Skill systematizes those checks into an enforced pre-commit validation workflow.

Yes. Pre-commit validation enforces quality rules on icons, UI strings, configuration, colors, logging, and naming conventions before code reaches review. This Skill generates JSON-formatted reports documenting which checks passed or failed, reducing manual review overhead.

This checklist applies to codebases following Qt-like patterns with UI resources, localization, configuration management, and structured logging. It validates project-specific concerns like color palettes, icon standards, and build integrity alongside general code quality rules.

The Skill outputs a JSON-formatted decision summary capturing which quality checks were applied, their results, and alignment with project standards like OpenSpec or ROADMAP. This creates an auditable record of code review rationale.