quality-control

Validate intelligence products for structural integrity, sourcing, and writing quality.

15|5|Updated Apr 6, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Liberty91LTD/cti-skills --skill quality-control-liberty91ltd
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: quality-control
Source: https://github.com/Liberty91LTD/cti-skills/tree/main/skills/quality-control
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Liberty91LTD/cti-skills --skill quality-control-liberty91ltd

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Peer-review and quality assurance are critical for intelligence products. This skill provides a structured, repeatable checklist to ensure that reports meet formal standards before release.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structural Integrity: ensures frontmatter completeness, logical section order, and documented formatting.
  • Analytical Rigor & Sourcing: enforces evidence support, explicit assumptions, and proper source evaluation.
  • Mandated Language & Technical Accuracy: guarantees confidence labels, clear distinctions between facts and assessments, and correct ATT&CK mappings where applicable.
  • Use Case: analysts run a final QA pass on threat reports, briefs, and advisories to prepare publish-ready documents.

Quick Start

Review a draft using the quality-control checklist to verify structure, sourcing, and writing quality before publication.

Frequently Asked Questions about quality-control

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate peer-review validation for intelligence products?

Automate peer-review validation by running a structured checklist that verifies structural integrity, sourcing, and writing quality to ensure intelligence products are publish-ready.

What is the best way to enforce Admiralty scale assessments and TLP usage in threat reports?

Enforce Admiralty scale assessments and TLP usage by applying automated quality-control checks that verify frontmatter completeness and mandated language before publication.

Does this quality-control process verify ATT&CK mappings and explicit confidence labeling?

Yes, the quality-control process verifies mandated language by checking that ATT&CK mappings are correct and explicit confidence labeling is present.

Can I use this checklist to validate structural integrity and logical section order for analytical deliverables?

Yes, you can validate structural integrity for analytical deliverables by checking frontmatter completeness, logical section order, and documented formatting.

How do I ensure analytical rigor and proper source evaluation in threat intelligence reports?

Ensure analytical rigor by enforcing evidence support, explicit assumptions, and proper source evaluation across the peer-review validation process.

What are the limitations of using a structured checklist for intelligence product quality assurance?

The checklist focuses on formal standards like structural integrity and mandated language, requiring a completed draft to validate and does not generate the intelligence content itself.