quality-enriched-prompting

Assess and improve prompt quality using a numerical scoring model.

6|1|Updated Nov 29, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/manutej/categorical-meta-prompting --skill quality-enriched-prompting
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: quality-enriched-prompting
Source: https://github.com/manutej/categorical-meta-prompting/tree/main/.claude/skills/quality-enriched-prompting
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/manutej/categorical-meta-prompting --skill quality-enriched-prompting

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill implements a 0,1-enriched category framework to enable continuous optimization of prompt quality. It models transformations as quality-rated morphisms and provides methods to evaluate, compare, and improve prompts across multiple dimensions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • 0,1-enriched category foundations for prompts, outputs, and contexts with quality-graded morphisms.
  • Multi-dimensional quality metrics and Pareto frontier analysis to identify optimal prompts.
  • LLM-based evaluation and guided improvements to co-create higher-quality prompts.
  • Enriched functors that map prompts to quality scores while preserving structure.

Quick Start

To begin, define an initial_prompt and a evaluation function, run iterative improvement until the desired quality is reached.

Frequently Asked Questions about quality-enriched-prompting

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I optimize prompt quality across multiple dimensions?

To optimize prompt quality across multiple dimensions, you can use multi-dimensional metrics and LLM-based evaluation to guide continuous improvements. This approach applies Pareto frontier analysis to identify optimal prompts.

What is 0,1-enriched category theory used for in LLM evaluation?

0,1-enriched category theory models prompt transformations as quality-rated morphisms. It maps prompts to continuous quality scores using enriched functors, enabling structured evaluation and comparison of LLM outputs.

How do I set up iterative prompt improvement with continuous quality scoring?

Define an initial prompt and an evaluation function, then run iterative improvement until the desired quality is reached. The framework uses LLM evaluation to co-create higher-quality prompts through enrichment-based composition.

Can I use Pareto frontier analysis for domain-agnostic prompt optimization?

Yes, Pareto frontier analysis supports domain-agnostic quality control by identifying optimal prompts across multiple dimensions. It evaluates trade-offs between different quality metrics to find the best performing prompts.

Do I need specific dependencies to implement enriched category prompt optimization?

No specific dependencies are required to implement enriched category prompt optimization. The framework operates independently to model prompt transformations and map them to continuous quality scores using enriched functors.

When should I use multi-dimensional metrics instead of single-score prompt evaluation?

Use multi-dimensional metrics when prompt quality involves trade-offs across different criteria. This approach models transformations as quality-graded morphisms, providing a richer evaluation than single scores by mapping to a Pareto frontier.