quality-gate

Automate end-to-end quality gating for scholarly manuscripts with review, integrity, and AIGC checks.

8|Updated Mar 18, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/TerryFYL/ai-research-army --skill quality-gate-terryfyl
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: quality-gate
Source: https://github.com/TerryFYL/ai-research-army/tree/main/skills/quality-gate
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/TerryFYL/ai-research-army --skill quality-gate-terryfyl

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

The Quality Gate consolidates manuscript review, integrity auditing with digital provenance, and AIGC self-checks into a single, end-to-end quality assurance workflow for scholarly manuscripts. It orchestrates the three checks to ensure formatting, data integrity, ethics disclosures, and AI-generated content risk are evaluated before submission, reducing rework and accelerating publication readiness.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • 7-dimension manuscript review and auto-fix: formatting, abstracts, statistics, consistency, reviewer expectations, language quality, and data-to-manuscript alignment.
  • Integrity auditing with digital provenance: NTС-based provenance chain, six-dimension compliance checks, AI-disclosure generation, and governed submission readiness.
  • AIGC risk self-check: detection and alignment with publication standards, plus downgrade strategies for high-risk content.
  • Upstream/downstream coordination: integrates with data-profiler, statistical-analysis, and submission-toolkit to form a complete editorial workflow.

Quick Start

Trigger quality gates on a manuscript draft by running the /qa review, /qa integrity, or /qa aigc commands.

Frequently Asked Questions about quality-gate

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run an end-to-end manuscript review and integrity audit before submission?

Run an end-to-end manuscript review and integrity audit by executing the /qa review, /qa integrity, or /qa aigc commands to evaluate formatting, data integrity, ethics disclosures, and AI-generated content risk before submission.

What is an AIGC risk self-check for scholarly manuscripts?

An AIGC risk self-check for scholarly manuscripts detects AI-generated content, aligns text with publication standards, and applies downgrade strategies for high-risk content to ensure disclosure compliance.

Does the manuscript quality gate check data-to-manuscript alignment and statistical consistency?

Yes, the manuscript quality gate checks data-to-manuscript alignment and statistical consistency, alongside formatting, abstracts, reviewer expectations, and language quality across seven review dimensions.

Can I integrate data provenance auditing with my existing scholarly workflow?

Yes, you can integrate data provenance auditing with your scholarly workflow; the quality gate coordinates upstream and downstream with data-profiler, statistical-analysis, and submission-toolkit to form a complete editorial workflow.

What is the best way to ensure format compliance and ethics disclosure for academic publishing?

The best way to ensure format compliance and ethics disclosure for academic publishing is applying a gated quality workflow that enforces six-dimension compliance checks and generates AI-disclosure statements.

Why do I need digital provenance chain verification for research manuscripts?

You need digital provenance chain verification for research manuscripts to establish an NTC-based provenance chain, ensuring data integrity and governed submission readiness while reducing publication rework.