quality

Analyze code quality and generate evidence-backed scorecards under .pipeline/quality.

24|3|Updated Apr 22, 2026

Search Tags:#automation #evidence #review #code-quality #baseline #scorecard #compare

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/HypoxanthineOvO/Hypo-Workflow --skill quality-hypoxanthineovo

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: quality
Source: https://github.com/HypoxanthineOvO/Hypo-Workflow/tree/main/skills/quality
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/HypoxanthineOvO/Hypo-Workflow --skill quality-hypoxanthineovo

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Codebases often lack objective, reproducible quality assessments. This skill generates one-time or baseline/comparative quality scorecards with concrete evidence to guide reviews and planning.

Core Features & Use Cases

Generate scorecards for current and baseline states across core dimensions with attached evidence.
Manage quality workflows via modes: scorecard, baseline, compare, review, and action queue, producing artifacts under .pipeline/quality.
Supports governance and safety gates by aligning outputs with audit processes and providing auditable reports.

Quick Start

Run /hw:quality on your project to generate an evidence-backed quality scorecard and initiate a baseline or compare workflow.

Frequently Asked Questions about quality

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I generate an evidence-backed code quality scorecard for my project?▼

Generate an evidence-backed code quality scorecard by running the quality skill on your local repository, which analyzes core dimensions and outputs reports under the .pipeline/quality directory.

Can I compare code quality against a baseline state across multiple dimensions?▼

Yes, you can compare code quality against a baseline state by initiating the baseline and compare workflows, producing comparative scorecards with concrete evidence across multiple dimensions.

Does the code quality assessment workflow require external tools or dependencies?▼

No, the code quality assessment requires no external tools or dependencies beyond local repository access to analyze the codebase and generate auditable artifacts.

What is the best way to integrate code quality scorecards with audit and safety gates?▼

Integrate code quality scorecards with audit and safety gates by using the review and action queue modes, which align outputs with governance processes to preserve auditability.

How does the action queue mode work for managing code quality remediation?▼

The action queue mode manages code quality remediation by processing baseline scorecards and evidence, generating actionable task queues under .pipeline/quality to guide review and planning.

When should I avoid using automated code quality scorecards for repository reviews?▼

Avoid automated code quality scorecards if your project lacks local repository access or if your workflow cannot integrate artifacts generated under the .pipeline/quality directory structure.