quality-master

Audit source code for Clean Code and SOLID principle violations.

2|Updated May 26, 2026

Search Tags:#refactoring #maintainability #solid #code-review #software-architecture #clean-code

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/albibenni/skills --skill quality-master

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: quality-master
Source: https://github.com/albibenni/skills/tree/main/quality-master
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/albibenni/skills --skill quality-master

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill addresses technical debt and maintainability issues by identifying structural flaws in code that violate industry-standard design principles.

Core Features & Use Cases

Clean Code Audit: Evaluates naming conventions, function purity, and comment density to ensure code readability.
SOLID Compliance: Performs a deep-dive analysis of code against the five SOLID principles to ensure modularity and scalability.
Refactoring Guidance: Provides actionable before-and-after code comparisons to resolve architectural bottlenecks.

Quick Start

Ask the quality-master to audit the provided source file for SOLID violations and suggest specific refactoring improvements.

Frequently Asked Questions about quality-master

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I check my source code for SOLID principle violations?▼

To check source code for SOLID principle violations, you audit snippets structurally to identify specific breaches of SRP, OCP, LSP, ISP, and DIP. This process highlights architectural bottlenecks and areas failing modularity standards.

What is the best way to refactor code to improve long-term maintainability?▼

The best way to refactor code for maintainability is by auditing it against Clean Code and SOLID design principles. This provides actionable before-and-after code comparisons to resolve architectural bottlenecks and improve structural integrity.

How does a clean code audit evaluate function purity and naming conventions?▼

A clean code audit evaluates function purity and naming conventions by analyzing code snippets for readability and structural flaws. It checks these elements alongside comment density to ensure the codebase meets industry-standard design principles.

Can I use this approach for architectural assessments during code reviews?▼

Yes, you can use this approach for architectural assessments during code reviews. It applies directly to software engineering workflows by auditing provided source files for structural flaws and modularity issues that impact long-term scalability.

When do I need to audit code integrity against design principles?▼

You need to audit code integrity against design principles when addressing technical debt and maintainability issues. This structural analysis identifies flaws violating industry standards during refactoring sessions or architectural assessments to ensure long-term software scalability.