quality

Review completed cook work and emit a structured stage_message with findings.

218|11|Updated Feb 22, 2026

Search Tags:#quality #code-review #git-diff #runtime-verification #stage-message #go-vet

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/poteto/noodle --skill quality-poteto

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: quality
Source: https://github.com/poteto/noodle/tree/main/.agents/skills/quality
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/poteto/noodle --skill quality-poteto

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Post-cook quality gate. Reviews completed cook work for correctness, scope discipline, and principle compliance. Emits stage_message events with findings.

Core Features & Use Cases

Autonomously evaluates the plan phase, commits, and changes against the defined scope.
Verifies code quality through standard checks, tests, and runtime verification, and flags high-severity issues.
Produces a structured stage_message payload that guides retries, escalations, or approvals.

Quick Start

Trigger this quality gate after cook completion to generate a stage_message with findings.

Frequently Asked Questions about quality

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I automate code review and quality checks on a git diff before committing?▼

Runtime verification validates code behavior during execution, complementing static analysis by catching high-severity issues through tests and runtime checks to gate pipeline progression with a structured verdict.

What is the best way to enforce scope discipline and prevent scope creep in code commits?▼

A stage_message report provides a structured payload detailing quality findings, high-severity issues, and a blocking flag, enabling automated pipelines to trigger retries, escalations, or approvals based on the verdict.

How do I run go-vet and standard code quality checks as a post-build pipeline gate?▼

Does runtime verification catch errors that standard code quality checks miss?▼

Autonomous quality gating evaluates the plan phase, git diff, and commit history against defined scope, verifying code quality and runtime behavior to emit a structured stage_message report without manual intervention.

What does a stage_message report contain for gating CI/CD pipelines?▼

Evaluating the plan phase and commit history against the defined scope verifies code changes align with original goals, flagging deviations and scope creep to block pipeline progression with a structured verdict.

Can I autonomously gate pipeline progression based on code review findings?▼