Quality Review

Apply artifact-specific quality-review checklists and output structured findings with fixes.

1|Updated Mar 11, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/BasharAmso/Bashi --skill quality-review-basharamso
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: Quality Review
Source: https://github.com/BasharAmso/Bashi/tree/main/create-bashi-app/template/.claude/skills/quality-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/BasharAmso/Bashi --skill quality-review-basharamso

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Automates structured quality reviews across artifacts—code, documentation, PRDs, and designs—helping teams identify issues early and maintain consistency.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Artifact-aware checklists adapt to the artifact type (code, docs, PRDs, architecture).
  • Outputs a concise review summary with findings, severity, and recommended fixes.
  • Integrates with STATE.md to track progress and supports a formal verdict (APPROVED or NEEDS WORK).

Quick Start

Provide the artifact you want reviewed and trigger a QUALITY_REVIEW_REQUESTED event to generate a structured quality report.

Frequently Asked Questions about Quality Review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run a structured quality review on a PRD or architecture document?

Run a quality review by providing your PRD or architecture document to trigger a review request, which applies an artifact-aware checklist to validate clarity and accuracy, outputting a structured summary with findings and recommended fixes.

What is an artifact-aware checklist and how does it adapt to different file types?

An artifact-aware checklist dynamically adjusts validation criteria based on the provided file type, applying specific quality checks for code, documentation, PRDs, architecture docs, or configuration files to ensure accurate artifact review.

Can I use this quality review process for configuration files and code artifacts?

Yes, you can use this quality review process for configuration files and code artifacts, as the system identifies the artifact type and applies suitable review criteria to generate a formal verdict of APPROVED or NEEDS WORK.

How do I track quality review progress and formal verdicts across project artifacts?

Track quality review progress by integrating with project STATE.md, which updates with your review results, findings, and recommended fixes to maintain a formal record of whether artifacts are APPROVED or NEEDS WORK.

Does the quality review checklist process expose sensitive project data?

No, the quality review checklist process ensures no sensitive data is exposed, validating artifacts strictly against type-specific criteria while securely generating a structured summary with recommended fixes.