quality-review-feedback

What problem does it solve?

Ambiguous or external code review comments often lead to either blind acceptance or unnecessary changes; this Skill structures the handling of review feedback so decisions are technically justified and recorded. It helps avoid superficial agreement, prevents unverified edits, and ensures each comment is evaluated against the codebase and tests.

Core Features & Use Cases

• Structured Reading & Paraphrase: Read the full feedback and restate each technical point in your own words to ensure understanding.
• Verification & Evaluation: Cross-check suggestions against the repository, tests, and contextual constraints to decide whether a suggestion is correct, needs clarification, or should be rejected.
• Actionable Outputs & Recording: Produce a per-item decision list (accept/clarify/reject) with technical reasons, implement fixes one by one, and write a summary to the current task record or .quality/quality-check.md.
• Use Case: When receiving an external review with multiple unclear items, use this Skill to validate each suggestion, avoid regressions, and produce a documented response and change set.

Quick Start

Please review the provided code review comments, identify which items to accept, clarify, or reject with technical reasons, and write a concise Review Feedback summary into .quality/quality-check.md.