What problem does it solve? Delivered code often passes its specification while still being hard to maintain, poorly tested, or inconsistent with the codebase's established patterns. This Skill evaluates engineering quality independently of the spec, producing a structured review report with severity-rated findings and an interactive resolution workflow. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Five-category quality assessment: Rates code organization, readability, error handling, test coverage, and observability/operability, calibrated to the project's maturity and existing conventions. - Structured findings report: Writes a report to .gener8v/changes/<change-slug>/reviews/ with Critical/Concern/Suggestion findings, a resolution log, and a verdict (Approved / Approved with Notes / Changes Required) that pipeline tooling can parse. - Two-phase workflow: Findings run in a fresh reviewer context in parallel with code-review and security-review; resolution runs interactively with the user, applying approved fixes and re-verifying them. - Use Case: After a ticket is delivered, run the review to catch a missing test for a safety bound, flag swallowed errors, and block the ticket with Changes Required until tests exist. ## Quick Start Review the delivery of TICKET-001 in the active change for engineering quality and test coverage.
