quality-review

Validate semantic quality of organon files during weekly audits.

Updated Feb 8, 2026

Search Tags:#heuristics #principles #quality-assurance #invariants #organon #semantic-review #identity-statements

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/VledicFranco/organon --skill quality-review-vledicfranco

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: quality-review
Source: https://github.com/VledicFranco/organon/tree/main/.claude/skills/quality-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/VledicFranco/organon --skill quality-review-vledicfranco

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Semantic review of organon files that goes beyond automated gates, ensuring invariants are testable, principles are properly prioritized, identity statements define real boundaries, and heuristics cover actual recurring decisions. This helps teams maintain high-quality organons during weekly audits or when reviewing new files.

Core Features & Use Cases

Semantic checks that validate invariant testability, principle ordering, and boundary definitions.
Heuristic coverage for recurring decisions and detection of anti-patterns.
Supports weekly quality audits and pre-merge reviews of new organon files.

Quick Start

Run automated gates and then perform a semantic quality review on the target organon files.

Frequently Asked Questions about quality-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I validate invariants and principles in organon files beyond automated gates?▼

A semantic quality review validates organon files beyond automated gates by checking that invariants are testable, principles are properly ordered, identity statements define real boundaries, and heuristics cover recurring decisions while avoiding anti-patterns.

What does semantic quality review check for in organon governance?▼

A semantic quality review checks that invariants are testable, principles are ordered, identity statements define real boundaries, and heuristics cover actual recurring decisions while detecting anti-patterns in organon governance files.

How do I audit organon files for testable invariants and proper principle ordering?▼

Run automated gates first, then perform a semantic quality review to validate that invariants are testable, principles are ordered, identity statements define real boundaries, and heuristics cover recurring decisions during weekly audits.

When do I need a semantic review for organon files?▼

You need a semantic review during weekly quality audits or when reviewing new organon files across domains to validate invariants, principles, identity statements, and heuristics beyond automated gates.

What's the best way to detect anti-patterns in organon heuristics and identity statements?▼

The best way to detect anti-patterns is a semantic quality review that ensures heuristics cover actual recurring decisions and identity statements define real boundaries, validating semantic quality beyond automated gates.

Can I use semantic review for pre-merge checks of new organon files across different domains?▼

Yes, semantic review supports pre-merge reviews of new organon files across domains by validating that invariants are testable, principles are ordered, identity statements define real boundaries, and heuristics cover recurring decisions.