quality-rubric

Score content quality across 10 dimensions and route rework.

30|4|Updated Feb 26, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Jeffallan/writing-with-agents --skill quality-rubric
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: quality-rubric
Source: https://github.com/Jeffallan/writing-with-agents/tree/main/skills/quality-rubric
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Jeffallan/writing-with-agents --skill quality-rubric

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the assessment and scoring of content quality, providing an objective measure to determine whether content meets publishable standards.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Objective Scoring: Scores content across 10 dimensions using a 1-5 scale, with specific evidence-based justification.
  • Quality Gate: Determines whether content passes or fails based on a defined set of criteria and minimum standards.
  • Rework Routing: Identifies areas of content that need improvement and suggests which workflow phase should handle the rework.

Quick Start

Evaluate the quality of the document 'final_article.md' using the quality-rubric skill.

Frequently Asked Questions about quality-rubric

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate content quality assessment to check if my articles meet publishable standards?

Automate content quality assessment by scoring articles against 10 dimensions using a 1-5 scale with evidence-based justification, determining whether content meets minimum publishable standards and routing rework as needed.

What is a content quality rubric and how does it score publishable content?

A content quality rubric scores content across 10 dimensions using a 1-5 scale, providing evidence-based justification for each score to determine whether content meets minimum publishable standards.

Can I use content scoring to automatically route rework for failed quality assessments?

Yes, content scoring can route rework by identifying specific content areas that need improvement and suggesting which workflow phase should handle the rework based on structured scoring criteria.

What do I need to define before evaluating content quality with a scoring rubric?

You need to define a specific content type and applicable scoring dimensions before evaluating content quality, as the quality assessment process requires these inputs to apply structured scoring criteria.

How does evidence-based justification work in content quality scoring?

Evidence-based justification in content quality scoring requires specific evidence to support each score across 10 dimensions, ensuring objective measurement of whether content meets publishable standards.

When should I use automated quality assessment instead of manual content review?

Use automated quality assessment when you need objective scoring across multiple dimensions with consistent evidence-based justification, especially for determining publishable standards at scale and routing rework systematically.