quick-dev

Transform software change requests into structured, reviewed code implementations.

4|2|Updated Apr 1, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/anderson-0/mighty-powers --skill quick-dev-anderson-0
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: quick-dev
Source: https://github.com/anderson-0/mighty-powers/tree/main/skills/quick-dev
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/anderson-0/mighty-powers --skill quick-dev-anderson-0

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill solves the challenge of turning vague development requests into structured, reviewable, and production-ready code changes while preserving project conventions and reducing implementation mistakes.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured Development Workflow: Guides feature work, bug fixes, refactors, and code changes through clarification, planning, implementation, review, and presentation phases.
  • Specification-Driven Execution: Creates actionable development specifications with acceptance criteria, dependency-aware tasks, and persistent workflow state.
  • Use Case: A developer can use this Skill to transform a feature request into a reviewed implementation plan, execute the changes safely, and prepare the work for human review.

Quick Start

Use the quick-dev skill to implement the requested feature, fix, or refactor while following the project's architecture and review workflow.

Frequently Asked Questions about quick-dev

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I structure a feature implementation workflow from a vague software request?

A feature implementation workflow transforms vague software requests into structured code changes by passing through clarification, planning, implementation, review, and presentation phases while maintaining persistent workflow state and acceptance criteria.

What is the best way to manage code refactoring while preserving project architecture?

Code refactoring that preserves project architecture requires specification-driven execution, which generates actionable development specifications with dependency-aware tasks and validation checkpoints to ensure architecture alignment throughout the process.

How does a specification-driven workflow execute bug fixing safely?

A specification-driven workflow executes bug fixing safely by enforcing controlled execution steps, tracking acceptance criteria, and applying validation checkpoints that prepare the corrected code for human review.

Can I use this structured development approach for both new feature development and code review?

Yes, this structured development approach applies to both new feature development and code review scenarios, transforming change requests into production-ready implementations through architecture alignment and dependency-aware task planning.

Do I need existing software specifications to start a structured code review workflow?

No, you do not need existing specifications to start a structured code review workflow because the process generates actionable development specifications with acceptance criteria from the initial change request.

Why does my software development workflow need validation checkpoints and acceptance criteria tracking?

Software development workflows need validation checkpoints and acceptance criteria tracking to reduce implementation mistakes, ensure controlled execution steps, and maintain reviewable state across feature work, bug fixes, and refactors.